Turbulent Cells and Telescopes: Seeking Help

  • Thread starter Thread starter skiboka33
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cells Telescopes
AI Thread Summary
Turbulent cells in the atmosphere affect telescopes differently based on their size, with larger telescopes experiencing a mix of random and systematic errors due to the full eddy effect. Smaller telescopes may encounter a total random error, while larger ones can see both positive and negative impacts from atmospheric turbulence. Understanding the scale of these eddies is crucial for comprehending their effects on telescope performance. The discussion emphasizes the need for clarity on how atmospheric conditions influence observational accuracy. Overall, the interaction between telescope size and atmospheric turbulence is a key factor in astronomical observations.
skiboka33
Messages
59
Reaction score
0
I don't understand why these turbulent cells in the atmosphere tend to cause different problems in larger and smaller scale telescopes. anyone who can help me out?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
skiboka33 said:
I don't understand why these turbulent cells in the atmosphere tend to cause different problems in larger and smaller scale telescopes. anyone who can help me out?
If you have a telescope with the whole eddy in sight it is different from a telescope with some plus and some minus effect altogether...
In the first case a total random error takes place in the second a adding of some plus and some minus error. In the first place a total random error and in the second place perhaps a systematic plus or minus error.
What I am am interested in: so you have a impression of the largeness of the eddies?
greetings Janm
 
Get on with these questions!
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...

Similar threads

Replies
54
Views
7K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top