Twin Paradox: Will Car A Age Slower?

bcrelling
Messages
69
Reaction score
2
If we have two twins driving cars.
They remain at the same height above sea level so gravitational time dilation is equal.
Both cars travel at the same speed so time dilation due to speed is equal for both.

However...
Car A drives around a small circular race track and experiences centripetal acceleration. Car B drives is a straight line and does a circuit of the globe.

Will car A age slower due increased angular acceleration it experiences?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you considering the planet to be rotating or non rotating?

Are you comparing their age using standard Schwarzschild simultaneity or some other method?
 
bcrelling said:
Will car A age slower due increased angular acceleration it experiences?
Angular acceleration is not something that you "experience" in a frame invariant sense. It's computed with respect to some point in some coordinates. And it has nothing to do with aging.

Did you maybe mean proper (centripetal) acceleration? Proper acceleration itself also doesn't affect the instantaneous aging rate:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clock_hypothesis
So assuming the planet is not rotating, and they have the same speed relative to the planet, they will age by the same amount between meetings.
 
  • Like
Likes bcrelling
To be exact:
The planet is not rotating.
Both riders start at the same time and same place.
Time is compared by the twins carrying clocks which are compared after driver B completes a circuit of the globe and both drivers meet at the starting point.

But I think you've already answered my question- there would be no difference between them.

Thanks!
 
Yes, there would be no difference. Here is how you would calculate it:

The Schwarzschild metric is ##d\tau^2 = (1-R/r) dt^2 - (1-R/r)^{-1}dr^2 - d\Omega^2## where ##d\Omega^2=r^2 (d\theta^2+\sin^2\theta~d\phi^2)## is the metric of a 2-sphere. On the surface of the planet let ##r=r_0## and ##v=d\Omega/dt##. So

##d\tau^2/dt^2 = (1-R/r_0) - v^2##

This does not depend on the shape of the path as long as it stays on the surface and goes at a constant speed.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes bcrelling
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top