Two Block Problem: Solving for Forces (Parts b & c)

  • Thread starter Thread starter ZanyCat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Block
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the Two Block Problem, specifically parts (b) and (c). The user initially calculated the force between two blocks, denoted as 'z', and found it to be 1.1N for part (a). For part (b), they conceptualized the blocks as a single system in equilibrium, concluding that the force 'z' opposing the applied force 'F' should equal 3.2N. However, confusion arises regarding the expected value of 2.1N, leading to questions about the interpretation of forces acting on the blocks. Clarification suggests that the force dynamics change when the force is applied differently in part (b).
ZanyCat
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
g3KVyFa.png


I'm sure you guys have never answered a physics question involving two blocks before :P

My question is regarding parts (b) and, by extension, (c).

For part (a), I called the force between the two blocks 'z' and solved \frac{F - z}{m1} = \frac{z}{m2} which gave me z = 1.1N, which was correct.

Conceptually for part (b), I imagined the two blocks as one system. Two forces are acting on the system in opposite directions and they have the same magnitude, so the system is in equilibirum and not accelerating. Now considering just the large mass, this must be in equilibrium also, as it must not be accelerating either. Thus to oppose the F force pushing right, the z force 'pushing' left on it from the smaller block must have the same magnitude as F, 3.2N.
When I solved a pair of simultaneous equations again, I also ended up with z = 3.2N.

So where is my thinking wrong? Where does the 2.1N come from?

Thanks :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In part (b), I think they mean that the force is removed from m1 and applied to m2, so there is only 1 force acting.
 
ap123 said:
In part (b), I think they mean that the force is removed from m1 and applied to m2, so there is only 1 force acting.
Right, otherwise the problem does not make sense.
You can calculate the force as in (a).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top