Two-body elastic collisions in two dimensions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a two-body elastic collision problem in two dimensions, where one object comes to rest after the collision. The initial approach involved breaking the problem into one-dimensional components for momentum conservation, but the user realized that the smaller object's final velocity cannot be zero without an external force. It was clarified that the problem is a textbook scenario, and the user misinterpreted the task, which is to find the kinetic energy of the larger object rather than its velocity vector. The conversation highlights that in elastic collisions, both momentum and energy are conserved, but with the given conditions, energy conservation can be bypassed in favor of momentum conservation. The discussion concludes with a suggestion to calculate the kinetic energy of both objects before and after the collision for further insight.
Zarathustra1
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
I have a problem in which two objects collide (elastic) in two dimensions. I am given the vectorial components of the initial velocities of each object as well as their masses, which are different. I also know the final velocity of the smaller object, which is 0 (it comes to rest after the collision). I am to find the vectorial components of the final velocity of the larger object, assuming complete conservation of momentum.

The way I attempted this problem is by separating it into two one-dimensional problems, one for the X-axis and the other for the Y-axis, applying the proper vectorial components of the velocity to each problem, and the solution to them would be their respective vectorial components of the velocity of the larger object after the collision.

Is this the correct way to do this?

Edit: Well, I just calculated the total momentum of my solution, and it's nothing like the total momentum of the two objects prior to the collision. This isn't looking good.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Is this a real life problem or a textbook problem?
For your momentums to work out, you'll need the velocity of the second object immediately after the collision. It can't have 0 velocity after being hit unless it is acted on by another external force.
 
whozum said:
Is this a real life problem or a textbook problem?
For your momentums to work out, you'll need the velocity of the second object immediately after the collision. It can't have 0 velocity after being hit unless it is acted on by another external force.

It's a textbook problem. It doesn't make much sense to me how the smaller mass would come to rest either, but I got to run with it I guess.

Incidentally, it would appear I misread the problem. I thought I had to find the velocity vector of the larger object after the collision, but instead I'm supposed to find its kinetic energy. That makes things much more simple. Still, though, I think the knowledge as to what I would have needed to do to find the velocity vector is to be desired.
 
The only case I know when one object has no velocity after elastically colliding with another is when both objects have the same mass and they collide head on. In this case, the colliding object stops, the object hit goes off with the speed of the object which just hit it. Obviously momentum and and energy are conserved. That this is not just a textbook answer can be readily ascertained by actually doing it with either pool balls or shuffleboard pucks.
 
Another way to look at it. A two dim problem like this has 4 unknowns given the pre-collision velocities and masses. Conservation of energy gives you one equation and conservation of momentum gives you two additional equations. That's 4 unknowns and 3 equations which is not solvable. You however are given two more equations and that's more info than needed. Hence you can dispense with conservation of energy and solve the prob strictly from conservation of momentum. After you finish, you might find it interesting to calculate the kinetic energy of the particles before and after the collision.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Back
Top