How Fast Can Two Blocks Move Without Sliding Apart?

  • Thread starter Thread starter chris097
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the minimum time for two blocks to move 7.00 m without the top block sliding off the lower block, given specific coefficients of friction. The maximum static friction force is calculated as 17.4696 N, while the kinetic friction force is 5.3339 N, leading to a net force of 12.1357 N. The acceleration of the system is determined to be 3.0801 m/s². Participants clarify that only the mass of the bottom block should be used in subsequent calculations for acceleration. The final time calculated for the motion is 2.13 seconds.
chris097
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement

The coefficient of static friction is 0.636 between the two blocks shown. The coefficient of kinetic friction between the lower block and the floor is 0.138. Force F causes both blocks to cross a distance of 7.00 m, starting from rest. What is the least amount of time in which the motion can be completed without the top block sliding on the lower block, if the mass of the lower block is 1.14 kg and the mass of the upper block is 2.80 kg?

http://capa.physics.mcmaster.ca/figures/kn/Graph08/kn-pic0832.png


The attempt at a solution

Fmax= UsN
=(.636)(2.80*9.81)
=17.4696 N

F(bottom) = UkN
= (.138)((2.80 + 1.14) * 9.81)
=5.3339

Fnet = 17.4696 - 5.3339
=12.1357

F=ma
a=F/m
=12.1357/(1.14+2.8)
=3.0801

d=v1*t + .5at^2
t=square root of (d/(.5a))
= square root of (7/(.5(3.0801)))
=2.13 s


where am i going wrong?
thank you
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
chris097 said:
Fmax= UsN
=(.636)(2.80*9.81)
=17.4696 N

F(bottom) = UkN
= (.138)((2.80 + 1.14) * 9.81)
=5.3339

Fnet = 17.4696 - 5.3339
=12.1357

this is the maximum net force that can accelerate the bottom block.
you should consider only the acceleration of the bottom block
in your next calculation.
 
Thank you.

But what do you mean consider on the bottom block. Do you mean use only the weight of the bottom block?
 
chris097 said:
Thank you.

But what do you mean consider on the bottom block. Do you mean use only the weight of the bottom block?

yes. Since you found the maximum net force on the bottom block, then you need to use the mass and the acceleration of the bottom block as well in F = ma
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top