A Two disks -- An educational problem

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter wrobel
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a kinematic problem involving two disks connected by a rigid bridge, where the goal is to determine the angular velocity and acceleration of the right disk based on the left disk's known values. The participants explore the implications of the disks' radii and their connection, noting that if the radii are equal, the disks behave like linked locomotive wheels, potentially moving in the same or opposite directions. Various equations are derived to describe the constraints on angular motion, and the uniqueness of solutions is debated, particularly when the disks have equal radii. The conversation also touches on the classic four-bar linkage theory, highlighting the complexities of motion and speed differences based on rotation direction. Overall, the problem serves as a rich topic for educational discussion in kinematics.
wrobel
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,139
Reaction score
987
Let me share an educational problem which I learned from my friend Prof. M. Kirsanov. Perhaps somebody finds it interesting to discuss it with students. I do.
The problem is pure kinematic.

Assume we have two disks which can rotate about their fixed centers ##A,C,\quad |AC|=b##. The radii of the disks are ##R,r,\quad R>r## respectively. The discks are connected by a rigid bridge ##BFGD## and ##B,D## are the hinges placed on the rims of the disks. At one moment the system has the position that is shown at the picture ; the angular velocity and the angular acceleration of the left disk are given: ##\omega,\varepsilon##.
Find angular velocity and angular acceleration of the right disk at this moment.

Can the system move in the vicinity of shown position? What is configuration space of this system? What if ##r=R##?
 

Attachments

  • diski.png
    diski.png
    2.7 KB · Views: 271
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes JD_PM, Lnewqban, Abhishek11235 and 1 other person
Physics news on Phys.org
Is connected by rigid bridge BFGD is same with connected by rigid rod BD in considering the motion ?
 
yes
 
wrobel said:
What if ##r=R##?
Then it's like linked locomotive wheels going at the same rate.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes anuttarasammyak and BvU
Ooo okay, I try the first part, but I maybe screw it up. Since$$\left(\frac{d}{dt}\right)_{t=t_0} \mathbf{BD} = (\omega_2 r - \omega R) \mathbf{e}_y$$and$$\left( \frac{d^2}{dt^2}\right)_{t=t_0} \mathbf{BD} = (\varepsilon_2 r - \varepsilon R) \mathbf{e}_y - (\omega_2^2 r - \omega^2 R) \mathbf{e}_x$$Point D constrained to perform circular motion about point B, i.e. ##\frac{d}{dt}|\mathbf{BD}| = 0##, so we have$$ (\omega_2^2 r - \omega^2 R) = (b+r-R)\left( \frac{\omega_2 r - \omega R}{b+r-R} \right)^2$$or in other words that$$\omega_2^2 r(b-R) + 2 \omega r R \omega_2 - \omega^2 R(b+r) = 0$$so in that case

$$\begin{align*}

\omega_{2,\pm} = \frac{-2 \omega r R \pm \sqrt{4 \omega^2 r^2 R^2 + 4R r \omega^2 (b-R)(b+r)}}{2r(b-R)} &= \left[ \frac{-r R \pm \sqrt{Rrb \rho}}{r(b-R)} \right] \omega

\end{align*}$$where ##\rho = |BD| = b + r - R##.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I have written formulas just for the case
ω≠0, ρ=b+r−R>0, ##R>r##
my result is
$$\omega_*=\omega p_\pm,\quad \varepsilon_*=\varepsilon p_\pm,\quad p_\pm=\frac{Rr\pm\sqrt{R\rho br}}{r(R-r)}$$
 
Let us take xy coordinate for moving points
B=(R\cos\theta,R\sin\theta)
D=(b+r \cos\phi, r \sin\phi)
BD^2 is constant
(b-R+r)^2=(R\cos\theta-b-r \cos\phi)^2+(R\sin\theta-r \sin\phi)^2
bR(1-\cos\theta)-br(1-\cos\phi)+Rr(1-\cos(\theta-\phi))=0...(1)
Taking time derivative
bR\sin\theta\dot{\theta}-br\sin\phi\dot{\phi}+Rr\sin(\theta-\phi)(\dot{\theta}-\dot{\phi})=0...(2)
Taking time derivative again
bR\sin\theta\ddot{\theta}-br\sin\phi\ddot{\phi}+Rr\sin(\theta-\phi)(\ddot{\theta}-\ddot{\phi})<br /> +bR\cos\theta\dot{\theta}^2-br\cos\phi\dot{\phi}^2+Rr\cos(\theta-\phi)(\dot{\theta}-\dot{\phi})^2=0...(3)
These three equations show constraints on angle, angular velocity and angular acceleration.

For ##\theta=\phi=0## , (3) becomes
bR\dot{\theta}^2-br\dot{\phi}^2+Rr(\dot{\theta}-\dot{\phi})^2=0
quadratic equation of ##\dot{\phi}## with ##\dot{\theta}## given. The solution is
\dot{\phi}=\dot{\theta}[ \frac{\pm\sqrt{\frac{b\rho}{Rr}}-1}{\frac{b}{R}-1}]
where
\rho=b-R+r
As ##\frac{b\rho}{Rr}>1##, + solution: ortho, - solution: reverse rotation.

Ref. post #4 in the special case of ##R=r##,##\rho=b## and
+ solution
\dot{\phi}_+=\dot{\theta}
like locomotive wheels.
- solution
\dot{\phi}_-=-\dot{\theta}\frac{\frac{b}{R}+1}{\frac{b}{R}-1}EDIT as suggested by @wrobel in post #8, time derivative of (3) after making ##\theta=\phi=0## is
bR\dot{\theta}\ddot{\theta}-br\dot{\phi}\ddot{\phi}+Rr(\dot{\theta}-\dot{\phi})(\ddot{\theta}-\ddot{\phi})=0
It would give the solution ##\ddot{\phi}_{\pm}## with ##\dot{\theta}, \ddot{\theta}, \dot{\phi}_{\pm}## provided,

\frac{\ddot{\phi}}{\ddot{\theta}}=\frac{1}{1+\frac{b}{R}}<br /> (-1+\frac{\frac{\frac{b}{r}\frac{b}{R}+\frac{b}{r}+\frac{b}{R}}{1+\frac{b}{R}}}{\frac{\dot{\phi}}{\dot{\theta}}-\frac{1}{1+\frac{b}{R}}}).

Using the previous result,
\frac{\ddot{\phi}_\pm}{\ddot{\theta}}=\frac{1}{1+\frac{b}{R}}<br /> (-1+\frac{\frac{\frac{b}{r}\frac{b}{R}+\frac{b}{r}+\frac{b}{R}}{1+\frac{b}{R}}}{[ \frac{\pm\sqrt{\frac{b\rho}{Rr}}-1}{\frac{b}{R}-1}]-\frac{1}{1+\frac{b}{R}}}).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes etotheipi
anuttarasammyak said:
et us take xy coordinate for moving points
my argument was the same but
anuttarasammyak said:
These three equations
there are no three equations: for ##\theta=\phi=0## (2) vanishes and we have to calculate ##\frac{d^3}{dt^3}##

A.T. said:
Then it's like linked locomotive wheels going at the same rate.
for ##R>r## there are two solutions. I am not sure that for ##R=r## the solution is unique

the function ##f(\phi,\theta)=|BD|^2## has a saddle point at ##\phi=\theta=0##.
The equation ##f=\rho^2## gives two intersecting curves in the plane ##(\phi,\theta)##.
That is the point:)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes anuttarasammyak and etotheipi
wrobel said:
I am not sure that for ##R=r## the solution is unique
It's not. The wheels can go in the same or opposite directions. But I think they will have the same speed in both cases.
 
  • #10
in my formulas the expression ##(R-r)## must be replaced with ##(R-b)##
Pardon
 
  • Like
Likes etotheipi
  • #11
I realized that in my initial expression I let ##b = |BD|##, whilst it is actually defined ##b = |AC|##. So I corrected that now in my post #5, and get the same as wrobel 😀
 
  • #12
Using notation of my post #7 the range of angles are
##\theta[-\theta_0,+\theta_0]## for R ##\geq## r
which satisfy law of sines
\frac{\sin\theta_0}{\rho+r}=\frac{\sin(\pi-\phi_0)}{R}=\frac{\sin(\phi_0-\theta_0)}{b}
where
\rho=b-R+r

Figure attached. Thanks @wrobel.
 

Attachments

  • 2disks.jpg
    2disks.jpg
    19.8 KB · Views: 249
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban
  • #13
Isn't this simply the classic four bar linkage routinely studied in Theory of Machines?
 
  • #14
haruspex said:
Consider the wheels almost touching. If the RH wheel rotates anticlockwise though some angle, moving D to D', then a circle radius BD centred on D' will intersect the LH wheel rim in two places, but both will be above the line BD.
I see one intersection above and one below. But they have different distances to BD, so for opposite rotation the speeds are not the same all the time. For same rotation direction the speeds are the same.
 
  • #15
A.T. said:
I see one intersection above and one below. But they have different distances to BD, so for opposite rotation the speeds are not the same all the time. For same rotation direction the speeds are the same.
You are right, my mistake.
 
  • #16
troisbarres%20ext%201.gif
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Wow
Likes dRic2, Charles Link, pervect and 7 others
  • #17
Dazzling. But how about
wrobel said:
rigid bridge BFGD
 
  • #18
BvU said:
Dazzling. But how about

rigid bridge BFGD
The BFGD bridge is not shown in the aninmation by @Lnewqban, but it is rigid. All you need is BD to have constant length.
 
  • Like
Likes BvU
  • #19
Oops, of course. Total goof ! o:)
 
Back
Top