Two Doppler Shifts: 800Hz to 126Hz

  • Thread starter Thread starter endeavor
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Doppler
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the frequency shift of a sound wave reflected from an approaching object, starting with an initial frequency of 800 Hz. The speed of sound at 20ºC is determined to be 343 m/s, and the object's speed is 25.0 m/s. The first Doppler shift results in a frequency of 858 Hz, while the second shift, treating the object as a source, yields a frequency of approximately 925 Hz. The final frequency shift is calculated to be about 125 Hz, aligning closely with the expected answer. The conversation highlights the importance of accurate algebraic calculations to avoid round-off errors.
endeavor
Messages
174
Reaction score
0
A stationary source directs an 800-Hz sound wave toward an approaching object moving with a speed of 25.0 m/s. What is the frequency shift of the reflected wave if the air temperature is 20ºC? (Hint: There are two Doppler shifts here. Why?)

f = 800Hz
the speed of sound = v = 331 + 0.6Tc = 343 m/s
the speed of the object = vo = 25.0 m/s
For the first doppler shift,
f1 = (v + vo)/v * f
f1 = 858 Hz
For the second doppler shift, I'm guessing that we use the object moving as the source of the sound and the original sound source as the observer:
f2 = v/(v - vo) * f1
f2 = 925 Hz

But the answer is 126 Hz!:confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The shift in frequency is the difference between the final frequency and the initial one, so your answer is actually correct. (925 - 800 = 125 Hz, which is close enough to the expected answer).
 
the Google calculator says:
(((343 + 25) / (343 - 25)) * 800) - 800 = 125.786164
Sometimes it's best to get an algebraic answer in terms of the given variables, then plug in the numbers. Otherwise, intermediate numerical values can introduce round-off errors.
 
robphy said:
the Google calculator says:
(((343 + 25) / (343 - 25)) * 800) - 800 = 125.786164
Sometimes it's best to get an algebraic answer in terms of the given variables, then plug in the numbers. Otherwise, intermediate numerical values can introduce round-off errors.
Yeah, my value of 125 Hz comes from the fact that I used f1 = 858 Hz, when I think it should've been 858.3xxxxxxx... I get it now. Thanks.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top