Two Frequency Input Solving for Output

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving for the output voltage across a resistor in a circuit with an input voltage of Vin = 4cos(t) + 5sin(2t), which operates at two different frequencies. Participants agree that the superposition principle can be applied by treating each frequency component separately to find the output voltage. It is emphasized that the output voltage across individual resistors will differ from the total voltage source due to the presence of multiple components in the circuit. Additionally, the importance of providing a circuit diagram for clarity is highlighted, as misunderstandings can arise from vague descriptions. Overall, the superposition method remains a relevant approach for analyzing circuits with multiple frequency inputs.
KasraMohammad
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Say for example you have a Input Voltage in a circuit that is equal to Vin = 4cost + 5sin2t. Clearly, the input is operating on two different frequencies, namely w=1 and w=2. I am trying to find the Output Voltage across an arbitrary resistor in the circuit. The circuit consists of resistors and a capacitor, so its quite plain and standard.

My question is, how do you solve for the output given the above input, considering the different frequencies? My intuitions tells me to solve using Vin=4cost first and get the Vout, then solve using Vin=5sin2t and get another value for Vout, and the actual Vout will be the sum of the two. Is that correct?
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
If you driving a load with a voltage source like what you gave, the voltage across the load is just Vin! Because you specified it is a voltage source and it has zero output impedance! It does not care what load it is!

I am just trying to give you a bad time. You have not given enough info on what is the output. You need to draw the circuit. Yes, if Vin = 4cost + 5sin2t, you treat is as two separate voltage one with w=1 and the other w=2.
 
I wasn't talking about the voltage across the TOTAL load. Read over the post again. I mentioned Vout being the Voltage across ONE arbitrary resistor in the circuit consisting of resistors(plural) and a capacitor. Thus, the voltage across the individual resistors will not equal the voltage source itself since there are other components also in the circuit. Give us newbs a hardtime, but don't forget reading comprehension! just giving you a hard time.

The last part of your post answered my question. So you treat it as two separate voltage sources. Thats what i needed. Thanks buddy!
 
Is Superposition method stiill taught?
 
KasraMohammad said:
I wasn't talking about the voltage across the TOTAL load. Read over the post again. I mentioned Vout being the Voltage across ONE arbitrary resistor in the circuit consisting of resistors(plural) and a capacitor. Thus, the voltage across the individual resistors will not equal the voltage source itself since there are other components also in the circuit. Give us newbs a hardtime, but don't forget reading comprehension! just giving you a hard time.

The last part of your post answered my question. So you treat it as two separate voltage sources. Thats what i needed. Thanks buddy!

Writing in a more concise way could avoid misunderstanding. If you want a proper answer to a specific question it is always a good idea to supply a diagram of the actual circuit rather than assuming you've described it unambiguously. What could "total load" possibly mean?
 
Also he could be more graceful in replying as he is the one that need help. I started out as a friendly joke, but no matter how I read the response, that didn't sound very friendly.
 
Kids these days!
 
sophiecentaur said:
Kids these days!

:smile::smile:
 
jim hardy said:
Is Superposition method stiill taught?

I was actually taken back a little...Is this a trick question or am I missing something? I actually went through Fourier Series etc. before I responsed! That's kind of got me into the joking mood!
 
  • #10
yungman said:
I was actually taken back a little...Is this a trick question or am I missing something? I actually went through Fourier Series etc. before I responsed! That's kind of got me into the joking mood!

It's bang right on as the way forward isn't it? You have to work out the answer in the frequency domain and then bung it all together together to find the time function.
 
Back
Top