Can Two Parallel Lines Actually Meet?

  • Thread starter Thread starter irony of truth
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lines Parallel
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of parallel lines and their intersection in different geometrical frameworks. In Euclidean geometry, parallel lines never meet, aligning with Euclid's postulates. However, alternative geometries, like projective and elliptic geometry, challenge this notion by redefining parallelism and intersections. In projective geometry, all lines intersect, including at a point at infinity, while elliptic geometry lacks parallel lines altogether. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the definitions and principles underlying various geometrical systems.
irony of truth
Messages
89
Reaction score
0
Hello.

I believe that there are proofs showing that two parallel lines meet at a certain point... but this cannot be proven through the concepts of a
simple geometry... some say that it can be proved by projective geometry.

Are there sites that show these proof?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Parallel lines never intersect... in a Euclidean geometry. This is actually one of Euclid's postulates. It is not a necessary postulate, though, and you can find other geometries where parallel lines do intersect.

Here's some information:

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/ParallelPostulate.html
 
Data said:
Parallel lines never intersect... in a Euclidean geometry. This is actually one of Euclid's postulates. It is not a necessary postulate, though, and you can find other geometries where parallel lines do intersect.

Here's some information:

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/ParallelPostulate.html


I think that's misleading. It is not that there exist geometries in which "parallel lines do intersect". Parallel lines, by definition, do not intersect. What is true is that there exist geometries (elliptic geometry) in which there are no parallel lines.
 
When you work in projective geometry, isn't it so that 2 lines are said to intersect at a point at infinity?
 
Yes, but still there are no *parallel* lines in projective geometry since all lines interesect.
 
fair enough~
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top