Two parallel springs, frequency change?

AI Thread Summary
When a mass is attached to two parallel springs, the effective spring constant doubles, which affects the frequency of the harmonic oscillator. The new frequency is calculated as the square root of 2 times the original frequency. This results in an increase in frequency due to the combined stiffness of the two springs. The discussion confirms that the frequency change is a direct consequence of the altered spring constant. Understanding this relationship is crucial for analyzing systems involving multiple springs.
StephenSanders
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Ok, you guys! Please note that this is NOT a homework question but merely something that's been bothering me for a while.

We have a vertical spring with a hanging mass M. We pull the mass down and let it go, thus creating a harmonic oscillator with the frequency f.

What happens with the frequency when we attach our weight to two parellel springs of the same type as described above?

I've been thinking about this one for a while now so any help is more than welcome.

Many thanks,
Stephen
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nvm, I think I finally got it. The answer is 2^(1/2)*old frequency. :)
 
Yes, the spring constant will double so the f will increase by √2.
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top