Two part 1d kinematics problem. Need help, not solution

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a two-part kinematics problem involving a parachutist who falls freely before deploying a parachute and then decelerates until reaching the ground. The user initially struggled to solve the problem, particularly in determining the time intervals and velocities before and after the parachute opens. They attempted to break the problem into two segments, using kinematic equations, but encountered errors in calculating the time and velocities. The advice given emphasizes using specific kinematic equations to find the correct values for each segment, suggesting a more structured approach could yield better results. Understanding the physical principles behind the motion is also highlighted as essential for grasping the concepts involved.
Terraist
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
1. A parachustist jumps from an airplane and freely falls y=49.4 m before opening his parachute. Thereafter, he decelerates at a=2.02 m/s2. As he reaches the ground, his speed is 3.11 m/s. How long was the parachutist in the air?

For this one I managed to get the solution already using a method someone else showed me. However, I fumbled a long time with this problem and got the wrong answers despite having a strategy in mind.

What I did was the following. I split the problem up into two parts: before the parachute opens and after. These are the variables as I defined them at the beginning of the problem:

v0=0, s0 = 0, for when parachutist jumps out plane.

v1 = ?, s1 =49.4m, a1 = 9.8 m/s2, t1 = ?, upon parachute release

v2 = 3.11 m/s, s2 = ?, a2 = -2.02 m/s2, t2 = ?, upon reaching ground

1. First I tried to find the time t2 between parachute release and reaching ground.

0.5at2 + v2t + s1

0.5(-2.02 m/s2)t2+(3.11 m/s)t +49.4m

using the Q-formula I got t2=8.712. Then I tried finding v1

v2=v1+at2

3.11 m/s = v1 + (-2.02 m/s2)(8.71s)
v1 = 20.7 m/s

3. Using v1, I could then find t1

t1 = (v1-v0)/a

t = 2.11s

The red part I think is where the mistake was. For that formula, I had to use v1, which I didn't know, but even if I did, would this approach still work? Plugging in values for v1, which I found later using a different method, still gave me wrong figures for t.

Rather than telling me how I could obtain a solution, please show me the mistake with this strategy and whether I could have tweaked it to make it work. I have struggled a long time with kinematics concepts and I admit my problem solving skills are subpar, so a physical description of what is occurring would be very helpful.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For the first part you can use two equations.

1) vf1^2 = vo^2 + 2*g*s. Here vo = 0.
2) vf1 = gt. Find t1.

For the second part follow the same procedure.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top