Two Particles' Spin Hamiltonian Analysis?

cacofolius
Messages
30
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi, I'm trying to familiarize with the bra-ket notation and quantum mechanics. I have to find the hamiltonian's eigenvalues and eigenstates.

##H=(S_{1z}+S_{2z})+S_{1x}S_{2x}##

Homework Equations


##S_{z} \vert+\rangle =\hbar/2\vert+\rangle##

##S_{z}\vert-\rangle =-\hbar/2\vert-\rangle ##

##S_{x} \vert+\rangle =\hbar/2\vert-\rangle##

##S_{x} \vert-\rangle =\hbar/2\vert+\rangle, ##

The states basis is ##\vert++\rangle,\vert+-\rangle, \vert-+\rangle, \vert--\rangle ##

3. The Attempt at a Solution


What I did was apply the hamiltonian to each basis ket

##H\vert++\rangle =(S_{1z}+S_{2z})\vert++\rangle + S_{1x}S_{2x}\vert++\rangle
= \hbar/2\vert++\rangle + \hbar/2\vert++\rangle + \hbar/2\vert-+\rangle . \hbar/2\vert+-\rangle = \hbar/2\vert++\rangle##

##H\vert+-\rangle = 0##

##H\vert-+\rangle = 0##

##H\vert--\rangle = -\hbar/2\vert--\rangle##

My questions:
1) Is it right to consider ##\vert-+\rangle . \vert+-\rangle = 0##, (since they're orthogonal states)? Because they're both ket vectors (unlike the more familiar ##<a|b>##).

2) In that case, is the basis also the hamiltonian's, with eigenvalues ##\hbar/2, -\hbar/2, 0## (degenerate) ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Post this in the advanced physics homework section
 
cacofolius said:
Is it right to consider |−+⟩.|+−⟩=0\vert-+\rangle . \vert+-\rangle = 0,
No, that's not right. Moreover, ## S_{1x}S_{2x}|++\rangle \neq \hbar/2\vert-+\rangle . \hbar/2\vert+-\rangle ##. It's like you are producing four electrons out of two electrons. The operator of the first particle only acts on the first entry of the ket and that of the second particle acts on the second entry.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top