Two phase decay equation solution

  • Thread starter Thread starter sherif1980
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Decay Phase
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving the equation e-ax + e-bx = c, where a, b, and c are constants. The left side represents the sum of two exponential decay processes, one fast and one slow. The user seeks to determine the positive value of x at which this expression equals the constant c. A key point raised is that typically, when dealing with simultaneous decay processes, the exponents are added rather than the expressions. This highlights a potential misunderstanding in the approach to solving the equation.
sherif1980
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello,

Does anyone know how to solve an equation of the form:

e-ax+e-bx=c

Where a,b and c are constants?

This left side of the equation represents the sum of two exponential decay processes, one fast and one slow. I want to know for what positive value of x the expression on the left side of the equation will decay to the constant c.

Thanks!

Sherif
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Normally, if you have two separate decay processes occurring at the same time, you don't add the expression. Instead, you add the exponents.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top