Two positively charged plates : interaction force

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the interaction force between two positively charged plates, each with charge Q and area A. A paradox arises as the calculated force suggests it should be zero due to the absence of an electric field between the plates, despite the expected attraction based on Coulomb's law. The energy stored in the electric field is also debated, as it appears to contradict the force calculation, particularly when considering fringe effects. The conversation highlights the importance of using the infinite sheet approximation correctly, as it fails when the separation between plates is not negligible compared to their dimensions. Ultimately, the need to account for fringe fields and the limitations of energy density calculations are emphasized.
Perpendicular
Messages
49
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I am facing a paradox, well it seems like one, resolving the interaction force between two equally charged plates each bearing a positive charge. Let us assume this as Q, and plates having area A.

On one hand , we can claim the force = Q^2/2Ae0 where e0 is the vacuum permittivity, as each plate bears a charge Q and generates a field Q/2Ae0 at points not too far off from itself or close to the edges.

But, if we look at the energy stored, I am getting a very different result. There is no field in the region between the two plates so the energy field density 1/2e0(E^2) is zero. Outside the plates, the electric field will remain ~ Q/2Ae0 from each plate, totalling Q/Ae0 at first and then begin trailing off as we go farther and farther. Eventually it will trail off completely. So if we move a plate, this trailing off merely starts at a different point and the net energy stored outside each plate is conserved. Hence energy is a constant therefore F = -dE/dr = zero. I can't accept this logically but neglecting the fringe field, this seems to imply some sort of internal screening of charges.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is no field in the region between the two plates...
How do you figure that?
 
Because at points not too far off to the edge, or corners, the field due to each plate can be approximated as charge density/2e0. They act in opposite directions.

I now realize though, this probably implies the fringe field is non-negligible in this case..
 
Oh I see, you wanted to make an approximation for the case that the dimensions of the sheets are very large compared with their separation - the infinite sheet approximation?

To use Gausses Law and F=qE ideas, each distribution of charge moves in the potential due to the other charges.

So each plate feels the force due to the field due to the other plate alone.
You appear to have been combining the fields in your arguments.

When in doubt though: return to Coulomb's law.
 
I know that each plate feels the field due to the other plate alone. I just want to derive that via energy stored in the electric field, and this seems to be impossible without the fringe field which is in turn very hard to numerically figure out. Ignoring it, I get F = zero which is absurd.
 
Well yes - the shortcut you tried (via energy density between the plates) (a) combines the fields, and (b) relies on the infinite sheet approximation ... which is not valid when the separation is comparable to or bigger than the dimensions of the sheets - which is what happens for the stored energy calculation since the sheets start at infinite separation.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top