Two rotating coaxial drums and sand transfering between them (Kleppner)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the conservation of angular momentum in a system of two rotating coaxial drums transferring sand between them. The initial analysis incorrectly treated the angular momentum of each drum separately, leading to confusion about the constancy of angular velocity and momentum. It is clarified that while individual angular momentum may change due to mass transfer, the total angular momentum of the combined system remains constant. Participants emphasize the importance of considering both drums together to avoid contradictions in the analysis. The conversation concludes with a consensus that the original assumptions need reevaluation to align with the principle of conservation of angular momentum.
yucheng
Messages
232
Reaction score
57
Homework Statement
A drum of mass ##M_A## and radius ##a## rotates freely with initial angular speed ##\omega _0##. A second drum of radius ##b>a## and mass ##M_B## is mounted on the same axis, although it is free to rotate. A thin layer of sand ##M_s## is evenly distributed on the inner surface of the smaller drum (drum ##A##). At ##t=0## small perforations in the inner drum are opened, and sand starts to fly out at a rate ##\dfrac{dM}{dt}=\lambda## and sticks to the outer drum. Find subsequent angular velocities of the two drums. Ignore the transit time of the sand

Kleppner, Problem 7.2
Relevant Equations
N/A
The solution is simple by noting that the total angular momentum of the system is constant. (Though I overlooked this)

Instead, I went ahead analyzing the individual angular momentum of both drums.

Let ##L_a## and ##L_b## be the angular momentum respectively. ##M_a##, ##M_b## be the instantaneous mass (including sand), ##M_{0a}##, ##M_{0b}## be initial mass.

Then $$L_a(t) = M_a a^2 \omega_a(t)$$ and $$L_a(t +\Delta t)= (M_a- \Delta m) a^2 \omega_a(t + \Delta t) + \Delta m a^2 \omega_a(t + \Delta t) = (M_a) a^2 \omega_a(t + \Delta t)$$

$$\Delta L_a = M_a a^2 (\omega_a(t + \Delta t) - \omega_a(t))$$
$$\frac{\Delta L_a}{\Delta t} = M_a a^2 \frac{\omega_a(t + \Delta t) - \omega_a(t)}{\Delta t}$$

Taking the limit, $$\frac{d L_a}{dt} = M_a a^2 \frac{d \omega_a}{dt}$$

But since there is no net torque, $$ \frac{d \omega_a}{dt} = \frac{d L_a}{dt} = 0$$, thus ##\omega_a## is constant.

This fits our prediction, but is this proof correct?

Next, we do the same for drum B, we get

$$L_b(t) = M_b b^2 \omega_b(t) + \Delta m a^2 \omega_a$$

$$L_b(t +\Delta t)= (M_b + \Delta m) b^2 (\omega_b(t) + \delta \omega_b)$$

Can I write ##\omega_b## instead of ##\omega_b(t)##?

Ignoring second order terms,

$$\Delta L_b = b^2 M_b \Delta \omega_b + \Delta m (b^2 \omega_b - a^2 \omega_a)$$
$$\frac{\Delta L_b}{\Delta t}= b^2 M_b \frac{\Delta \omega_b}{\Delta t} + \frac{\Delta m}{\Delta t} (b^2 \omega_b - a^2 \omega_a)$$
Taking the limits,
$$\frac{d L_b}{d t}= b^2 M_b \frac{d \omega_b}{d t} + \frac{d m}{d t} (b^2 \omega_b - a^2 \omega_a)$$

Since $$L_b=I \omega_b= M_b b^2 \omega_b$$, I thought of solving the differential equation:

$$d L_b= (b^2 M_b \frac{d \omega_b}{d t} + \frac{d m}{d t} (b^2 \omega_b - a^2 \omega_a))dt$$

But ##M_b=M_0b + \lambda b t##

$$d L_b= (b^2 (M_b=M_{0b} + \lambda b t)\frac{d \omega_b}{d t} + \lambda (b^2 \omega_b - a^2 \omega_a))dt$$

How should I go about integrating this equation?

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
yucheng said:
.
$$L_a(t +\Delta t)= (M_a- \Delta m) a^2 \omega_a(t + \Delta t) + \Delta m a^2 \omega_a(t + \Delta t) = (M_a) a^2 \omega_a(t + \Delta t)$$Thanks in advance!
1. Why would ##\omega_a## change?
2. Why after subtracting ##\Delta ma^2 \omega_a(t + \Delta t)## do you add it on again?
You don't need the ##\Delta t## in there; that would be a second order small quantity.
I assume ##\Delta m= \lambda\Delta t##.
 
@haruspex Oops, ##\omega_a(t+\Delta t)## is supposed to be a function of time.

for 2. I was thinking, angular momentum does not change, so... I add that in?

Or, does this angular momentum analysis not work, because I should be considering drum a and drum b at once, not separately?
 
yucheng said:
for 2. I was thinking, angular momentum does not change, so... I add that in?
It's losing mass, but its angular momentum doesn't change? Is it going faster?!
 
haruspex said:
It's losing mass, but its angular momentum doesn't change? Is it going faster?!
Yes it's going faster, Oh, a contradiction!
 
yucheng said:
Oh, a contradiction!
No contradiction, it just loses angular momentum.
yucheng said:
I should be considering drum a and drum b at once, not separately?
Yes, the angular momentum of the combined system is conserved.
 
  • Like
Likes yucheng
haruspex said:
No contradiction, it just loses angular momentum.
I mean, if I were to assume my original equation holds, then I can derive a contradiction? Since in my original equation I assumes that angular momentum does not change. While in fact, my conclusion that angular velocity does not change, says it does?
 
yucheng said:
I mean, if I were to assume my original equation holds, then I can derive a contradiction? Since in my original equation I assumes that angular momentum does not change. While in fact, my conclusion that angular velocity does not change, says it does?
Ok.
Did you see my edit to post #6?
 
Yep, thanks!
haruspex said:
Ok.
Did you see my edit to post #6?
 
Back
Top