1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Two Slit Interference

  1. Jul 20, 2008 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    An optical two-slit experiment is setup with its slits separated by 40 X 10-3 cm and produces a second order maximum at an angle of 0.09 degrees. What would the wavelength of the light need to be if we kept the position of the second order maximum the same, but increased the slit separation of 63 X 10-3 cm?

    2. Relevant equations
    wsinϑ=mλ

    3. The attempt at a solution
    630000nm*sin0.09=2λ
    λ=494.8nm

    I'm almost positive that this is right, but the system won't accept my answer. Please help me!
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Jul 20, 2008 #2

    Kurdt

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    I agree with you. Does the system want it in any other units?
     
  4. Jul 20, 2008 #3

    Redbelly98

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Two things occur to me:

    1. Do they mean the final slit separation is 63 X 10-3 cm, or is that amount to be added to the original 40 X 10-3 cm?

    2. Perhaps they are expecting an answer rounded to the nearest 1 nm?
     
  5. Jul 20, 2008 #4
    It asks for the answer in nm. I tried adding the final slit separation to the original and it didn't work either.
     
  6. Jul 20, 2008 #5

    Redbelly98

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    "63 X 10-3 cm" is a rather odd way to express a number or distance, since it's not proper scientific notation. You might double-check that this is actually what they say in the problem statement.

    Proper scientific notation would be (for example)
    6.3 x 10-2 cm.
     
  7. Jul 20, 2008 #6
    Yeah it says 63 X 10-3 cm. I copied and pasted the question.
     
  8. Jul 20, 2008 #7

    Doc Al

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    That highlighted word doesn't seem correct. Is it "to" or "by", by any chance?
     
  9. Jul 20, 2008 #8
    No, it's "of".
     
  10. Jul 20, 2008 #9

    Doc Al

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Is this from a textbook?
     
  11. Jul 20, 2008 #10
    It's online homework. Maybe it's glitched.
     
  12. Nov 20, 2009 #11
    the equation you are looking for is;
    sin[tex]\theta[/tex]=n[tex]\lambda[/tex]/2d

    [tex]\lambda[/tex]=(2d)sin[tex]\theta[/tex]/n

    "two-slit experiment is setup with its slits separated by 40 X 10-3 cm"
    --this being two-slit means it is 2d
     
  13. Nov 21, 2009 #12

    Doc Al

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    :confused: All you've done is taken the standard formula and renamed the slit separation 2d instead of the usual d.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Two Slit Interference
  1. Two-slit interference (Replies: 4)

Loading...