Tyrolean Traverse/Static Equilibrium Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter SMA83
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Equilibrium
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the physics behind the Tyrolean traverse, a climbing technique involving a rope anchored across a chasm. A climber weighing 75 kg creates tension in the rope, which must be calculated to ensure safety, with a recommended safety factor of 10 for a maximum tension of 28 kN. The climber's position at the center of a 25-meter span requires determining the minimum sag distance for safety. Initial calculations led to an incorrect sag distance due to a confusion between trigonometric functions, but the correct sag was later found to be 1.7 meters, which was accepted by the physics platform. Understanding these calculations is essential for safe climbing practices.
SMA83
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In a mountain-climbing technique called the "Tyrolean traverse," a rope is anchored on both ends (to rocks or strong trees) across a deep chasm, and then a climber traverses the rope while attached by a sling as in the figure (Intro 1 figure) . This technique generates tremendous forces in the rope and anchors, so a basic understanding of physics is crucial for safety. A typical climbing rope can undergo a tension force of perhaps 28 kN before breaking, and a "safety factor" of 10 is usually recommended. The length of rope used in the Tyrolean traverse must allow for some "sag" to remain in the recommended safety range.

Consider a 75-kg climber at the center of a Tyrolean traverse, spanning a 25-m chasm. To be within its recommended safety range, what minimum distance x must the rope sag?

I attatched the picture from masteringphysics.

Homework Equations



\sum{F}=0

The Attempt at a Solution



T=2800 (this is 28 kN/10 for the safety factor)
m=75 kg

\sum{F}=2Tsin\vartheta-mg=0

\vartheta=sin^{-1}\frac{mg}{2T}=7.54 degrees

cos\vartheta=\frac{x}{12.5}

x=12.39 m

Obviously, this answer is too large, and I've verified that masteringphysics won't accept it, but I'm still pretty confused as to where I went wrong. Thanks in advance for the help!
 

Attachments

  • GIANCOLI_ch12_p96.jpg
    GIANCOLI_ch12_p96.jpg
    8.8 KB · Views: 1,309
Physics news on Phys.org
x/12.5 is tan(theta), not cos (theta)
 
doh! I knew it would be something simple that was throwing me off. Well thanks for the help...I got 1.7 m now, and masteringphysics approves, so all is right with the world.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top