UK Plutonium Problem: Fast Reactor or MOx Plant?

  • Thread starter Thread starter koab1mjr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Uk
AI Thread Summary
The UK is considering options for managing its plutonium stocks, focusing on either a MOx plant or fast reactor technology. There is strong support for fast reactors, particularly the GEH Prism fast reactors, as they can eliminate plutonium while generating power. Some argue against burning plutonium, citing the high costs of its production and potential future needs for it. Concerns about secure storage of plutonium are also raised, suggesting that long-term containment may be a viable alternative. The discussion highlights the balance between energy production and the management of nuclear waste.
koab1mjr
Messages
105
Reaction score
0
I was curious to know the PF communities opinion on the recent press the UK has been generating in its choice on retrying a MOx plant or dabbling with a Fast Reactor Tech


How would you all vote if you were in charge?


I am for fast reactors since the industry needs the push but I am biased as a young person in the field.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I'd say they should go with the two pack of GEH Fast Reactors. Get rid of the plutonium and produce power while they're at it!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thermalne said:
I'd say they should go with the two pack of GEH Fast Reactors. Get rid of the plutonium and produce power while they're at it!

Why should we get rid of the plutonium (I assume weapon grade)? It was produced at horrendous expense. If we burn it now and then need it again (asteroid blasting?), we will need to make it again.

What's the problem with just storing it somewhere secure?
 
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Hi everyone, I'm a complete beginner with MCNP and trying to learn how to perform burnup calculations. Right now, I'm feeling a bit lost and not sure where to start. I found the OECD-NEA Burnup Credit Calculational Criticality Benchmark (Phase I-B) and was wondering if anyone has worked through this specific benchmark using MCNP6? If so, would you be willing to share your MCNP input file for it? Seeing an actual working example would be incredibly helpful for my learning. I'd be really...

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
5K
Replies
17
Views
8K
Replies
8
Views
8K
Replies
29
Views
10K
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
31
Views
5K
Back
Top