Unable to decrypt emission/absorption matrix element

  • Thread starter Thread starter provolus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Element Matrix
provolus
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Unable to "decrypt" emission/absorption matrix element

Hi to everyone! I'm reading an example of atom radiation interaction (more precisely, an atom emits a photon which photoionizes another atom) on an old book (60s) and I'm facing a matrix element which I never saw. I mean, I'm not able to recognize in it those usual elements you can find in ordinary treatments of photon-atoms transitions. Since the author does not provide any reference from where he derives this kind of notation, I'm not able to understand how he calculates the amplitude probability of photon emission followed by the photon absorption.

If somebody can tell me how to interpret this matrix element or, better, suggest me some reference where I can find the same kind of notation, I'll be very happy and grateful!

For example, the emission matrix element for the atom which emits the photon is:
<br /> V = C \hat{p} \cdot \hat{A} k^{-\frac{1}{2}} \exp[-i\textbf{k}\cdot\textbf{r}]<br />

where:

C includes costants which are not important;
\hat{p} unit polarization vector of the dipole radiative transition in the atom;
\hat{A} polarization vector of the photon
\textbf{k} wave vector of the photon
\textbf{r} position of the atom

The absorption matrix element is similar: position vector (r') and polarization-dipole-vector (p') referred to the other atom, same wave vector (k) for the photon but a plus sign on the exponential part.
What puzzles me is: where are the initial and final states of the sistem? from where comes k^{-\frac{1}{2}}? and what is \hat{p} if the term \exp[-i\textbf{k}\cdot\textbf{r}] is given? usually, this last term is expanded in dipole approximation and one gets a dipole operator (i.e. \textbf{D}=e\textbf{r})...


thx for the help
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


Forgot to say:

wave vector \textbf{k} is in radiant/second
energies are in radiant/second
position vector \textbf{r} in cseconds with c speed of light.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top