Uncertainly Principle Fast Neutrons

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the uncertainty of fast neutrons used in cancer treatment, with a given average velocity of 3.0 x 10^7 m/s and a mass of 1.674920 x 10^-21 kg. The user attempts to apply the uncertainty principle using the formula Δx x (mΔv) ≥ h/(4π) but questions whether the problem truly reflects quantum mechanics. The calculation yields an uncertainty of 7.91 x 10^-22 meters, prompting a debate on whether the known velocity range represents a fundamental uncertainty or merely a lack of knowledge about individual neutrons. The conversation highlights the complexities of interpreting quantum mechanics in practical applications.
CGallin
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hey everyone, I've been trying to figure out what went wrong here for abit now and I think maybe a fresh pair of eyes might help. If anyone could point me in the direction of my error that would be great.

Thanks

Homework Statement


An effective treatment for some cancerous tumors is irradiation with "fast" neutrons. The neutrons from this treatment have an average velocity of 3.0 x 107 m/s. If the velocities of individual neutrons are known to be within 2% of this value, what is the uncertainty of one of them?

velocity = 3.0 x 107 m/s
mass of neutron = 1.674920 x10-21 kg
planck's constant = 6.626x10-34m2 kg / s

Homework Equations



(Δx) x ((m)(Δv)) ≥ h/(4∏)

The Attempt at a Solution



Δx = (h/(4∏) / ((m)(Δv))

= ((6.626x10-34m2 kg / s)/ (4∏)) / ((1.674920 x10-21 kg)(3.0 x 107 m/s)

Δx = 7.91 x 10-22 meters
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is this really a quantum mechanics question?
Just based on the formulation, I would expect that "known to be" is just our ignorance about individual neutrons, not the fundamental uncertainty in the neutron wave function. In that case, the uncertainty would simply be a velocity uncertainty - and after some distance (and time), the beam is spread out in space as well.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top