Uncertainty of Time | Atomic Clocks & Pulsars

  • Thread starter Thread starter GingerBread27
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Time Uncertainty
AI Thread Summary
Time standards are currently based on atomic clocks, with pulsars emerging as a potential alternative due to their stable rotation rates. A specific pulsar rotates every 1.424 806 448 872 75 2 ms, which allows for precise time measurement. Calculations show that this pulsar rotates approximately 1.27 billion times in 21 days and takes about 1424.8064 seconds for 1 million rotations. Uncertainty in these measurements can be determined using error propagation formulas, which simplify for single dimensions. The discussion highlights confusion regarding the calculation of uncertainty, suggesting a need for clearer methods.
GingerBread27
Messages
108
Reaction score
0
Time standards are now based on atomic clocks. A promising second standard is based on pulsars, which are rotating neutron stars (highly compact stars consisting only of neutrons). Some rotate at a rate that is highly stable, sending out a radio beacon that sweeps briefly across Earth once with each rotation, like a lighthouse beacon. Suppose a pulsar rotates once every 1.424 806 448 872 75 2 ms, where the trailing 2 indicates the uncertainty in the last decimal place (it does not mean 2 ms).
(a) How many times does the pulsar rotate in 21.0 days?
The answer is 1.27e9
(b) How much time does the pulsar take to rotate 1.0 x 10^6 times? (Give your answer to at least 4 decimal places.)
The answer is 1424.8064 seconds
(c) What is the associated uncertainty of this time?

For this problem I am unsure of how the uncertainty is calculated. I understand parts a and b but not C. Please help.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think your answer to b) is off.

It's rotating once every 1.424 806 448 872 75 2 ms. so for it to rotate 1.000 time plus 0.0106 times, you're definitely not going to be in the 1400 second range.

That's about 20 minutes to go a little more than it was going in beyond less than a second. Recalculate that and you should get a better start for finding the uncertainty.
 
This answer is the right answer, but it should say: How much time does the pulsar take to rotate 1.0 X 10^6 times?
 
Use the error propogation formula:
s = \sqrt{ \left( \frac{\delta u}{\delta x} \right)^2_{y,z}s_x^2 + \left( \frac{\delta u}{\delta y} \right)^2_{x,z}s_y^2 + \left( \frac{\delta u}{\delta z} \right)^2_{x,y}s_z^2 }
This is the 3 dimensional [x,y,z] form of the equation. In this case you only have a single dimension, so, it simplifies to
s = \sqrt{ \left( nt \right)^2 s_t^2 }
where s is the total uncertainty, n is number of cycles, t is cycle time and s sub t is uncertainty per cycle.
 
I get some incredibly odd answer. I think this problem has a simple way that it should be solved and I just don't know what it is.
 
last minute hope lol can anyone help?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top