Uncertainty Principle: Missing Target by Typical Distance

asdfghjkl
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Can anyone help me on this??

In a contest to drop a marble with mass 30 g from the roof of a building onto a small target 50 m below. From uncertainty principle considerations, what is the typical distance by which you will miss the target, given that you aim with the highest possible accuracy? Ignore wind and air resistance.

[Hint: Let x be the coordinate in the horizontal direction. You should realize that the uncertainty in the position x of the marble when it reaches the ground depends on both the initial uncertainty in the position xi, and the initial uncertainty in the speed vx.]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let the initial position x0 lie in the interval:
[-dx,dx]

Let the initial velocity v0 lie in the interval:
[-dv,dv]

Now use the ordinary kinematic equations to figure out the extreme values of x(t) and v(t) when the marble hits the target.
 
Would the uncertainty principle apply to a marble?

I was always told that it applied to sub-atomic particles. Even atoms were supposed to obey semi-classical formula in my education.
 
I've had a longer think about this question (and I haven't done any active physics for years, please forgive the poorly articulated arguement) but I would expect the following:

A particle of uncertainty dX has 2/3 chance of being in the region
x +/- dx.

Two particles each with an uncertainty of dx in a system (ignoring the interactions) should have a centre with a lower uncertainty. Even if both particles are outside the 2/3 probability, if one is on the extreme left and one on the extreme right, this would cancel.

So a mole of particles(or say 10^23) should have a centre with almost no uncertainty even without taking into account the structure of the substance.

I reason that the same is true of particle momenta.

I think this reasoning is wrong because you are all brilliant and I'm useless (and the marble question sounds like a formal one). But why?

Sorry this post was put together at lunch in a cafe. I usally have time to make a proper go of it.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top