Uncertainty values for non-Gaussian functions

PhyPsy
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
Uncertainty values for non-Gaussian wave packet functions

Homework Statement


\phi(k)= \left\{ \begin{array}{cc} \sqrt{\frac{3}{2a^3}}(a-|k|), & |k| \leq a \\ 0, & |k|>a \end{array} \right.
\psi(x)= \frac{4}{x^2}sin^2 (\frac{ax}{2})
Calculate the uncertainties \Delta x and \Delta p and check whether they satisfy the uncertainty principle.

Homework Equations


\Delta x\Delta p \geq h/2

The Attempt at a Solution


The solution is worked out in the book, which is \Delta k=a and \Delta x=\pi /a. I understand that for a Gaussian distribution, you can use the standard deviation as \Delta x and \Delta k, and this leads to the lowest limit of the uncertainty relation, h/2. I don't see how I'm supposed to come up with \Delta x and \Delta k for non-Gaussian functions, though. The book seems to just pick \Delta k=a and \Delta x=\pi /a somewhat arbitrarily without explaining why these values were chosen. Could someone tell me if there is a method for figuring out what the uncertainties should be for non-Gaussian functions like this one?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If we are measuring the eigenvalue a of an observable A, then we may characterize the uncertainty \Delta a in a using the statistical variance:

(\Delta a)^2 = \langle A^2 \rangle - \langle A\rangle^2.

This definition works for any state we use to compute the expectation values. In fact, this definition is the one used in the derivation of the generalized uncertainty principle.
 
\langle A\rangle=0 for both functions, so (\Delta a)^2= \int ^\infty _{-\infty}a^2 f(a) da

(\Delta k)^2= \int ^\infty _{-\infty} k^2 |\phi(k)|^2 dk = \frac{3}{2a^3} [\int ^0 _{-a} k^2 (a+k)^2 dk + \int ^a _0 k^2 (a-k)^2 dk]
=\frac{3}{2a^3} [(\frac{1}{3} a^2 k^3 + \frac{1}{2} a k^4 + \frac{1}{5} k^5)| ^0 _{-a} + (\frac{1}{3} a^2 k^3 - \frac{1}{2} a k^4 + \frac{1}{5} k^5)| ^a _0
=\frac{3}{2a^3} \frac{2}{30} a^5 = \frac{a^2}{10}
\Delta k = \frac{a}{\sqrt{10}}
\Delta p = \frac{a \hbar}{\sqrt{10}}

(\Delta x)^2= \int ^\infty _{-\infty} x^2 |\psi(x)|^2 dx = 16 \int ^\infty _{-\infty} \sin ^4 (\frac{ax}{2}) dx / x^2
=16[\frac{1}{2} a Si(ax) - \frac{1}{4} a Si(2ax) - \sin ^4 (\frac{ax}{2}) / x]|^\infty _{-\infty} = 16(\frac{a \pi}{2} - \frac{a \pi}{4}) = 4a \pi
\Delta x = 2 \sqrt{a \pi}

\Delta p \Delta x = \frac{2a \hbar \sqrt{a \pi}}{\sqrt{10}}
So whether or not this is greater than \hbar / 2 depends on what a is. Did I do something wrong here?
 
Last edited:
PhyPsy said:
\langle A\rangle=0 for both functions, so (\Delta a)^2= \int ^\infty _{-\infty}a^2 f(a) da

(\Delta k)^2= \int ^\infty _{-\infty} k^2 |\phi(k)|^2 dk = \frac{3}{2a^3} [\int ^0 _{-a} k^2 (a+k)^2 dk + \int ^a _0 k^2 (a-k)^2 dk]
=\frac{3}{2a^3} [(\frac{1}{3} a^2 k^3 + \frac{1}{2} a k^4 + \frac{1}{5} k^5)| ^0 _{-a} + (\frac{1}{3} a^2 k^3 - \frac{1}{2} a k^4 + \frac{1}{5} k^5)| ^a _0
=\frac{3}{2a^3} \frac{2}{30} a^5 = \frac{a^2}{10}
\Delta k = \frac{a}{\sqrt{10}}
\Delta p = \frac{a \hbar}{\sqrt{10}}

I agree with this, but we'd also want to calculate \Delta p using \hat{x} = -i\hbar d/dp in the momentum representation. Note that \psi(x) is not the Fourier transform of \phi(k), so we really have two problems to solve here.

(\Delta x)^2= \int ^\infty _{-\infty} x^2 |\psi(x)|^2 dx = 16 \int ^\infty _{-\infty} \sin ^4 (\frac{ax}{2}) dx / x^2
=16[\frac{1}{2} a Si(ax) - \frac{1}{4} a Si(2ax) - \sin ^4 (\frac{ax}{2}) / x]|^\infty _{-\infty} = 16(\frac{a \pi}{2} - \frac{a \pi}{4}) = 4a \pi
\Delta x = 2 \sqrt{a \pi}

\Delta p \Delta x = \frac{2a \hbar \sqrt{a \pi}}{\sqrt{10}}
So whether or not this is greater than \hbar / 2 depends on what a is. Did I do something wrong here?

Again, this is a completely different wavefunction, so we can't use the uncertainty in momentum that we computed from the other one. Use \hat{p} = -i\hbar d/dx to compute it.
 
Actually, \psi (x) is the Fourier transform of \phi (k), or at least it is supposed to be...

\psi (x)= \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi}} \int ^\infty _{-\infty} \phi(k) e^{ikx} dk
=\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2 \sqrt{\pi a^3}} [\int ^0 _{-a} (a+k)e^{ikx} dk + \int ^a _0 (a-k)e^{ikx} dk]
=\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2 \sqrt{\pi a^3}} [\int ^0 _{-a} ke^{ikx} dk - \int ^a _0 ke^{ikx} dk + a \int ^a _{-a} e^{ikx} dk]
=\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2 \sqrt{\pi a^3}} [\frac{a}{ix} e^{-iax} + (1 - e^{-iax} )/ x^2 - \frac{a}{ix} e^{iax} - (e^{iax} - 1)/ x^2 + 2a \sin (ax) /x]

At this point, the book just says that after some calculations, the answer is \psi (x) = 4 \sin ^2 (\frac{ax}{2}) / x^2. I don't know how they came up with that; the answer I got is \frac{\sqrt{3}}{x^2 \sqrt{\pi a^3}} [1 - \frac{ax}{2} \sin (ax) - \cos (ax)].
 
Hello everyone, I’m considering a point charge q that oscillates harmonically about the origin along the z-axis, e.g. $$z_{q}(t)= A\sin(wt)$$ In a strongly simplified / quasi-instantaneous approximation I ignore retardation and take the electric field at the position ##r=(x,y,z)## simply to be the “Coulomb field at the charge’s instantaneous position”: $$E(r,t)=\frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_{0}}\frac{r-r_{q}(t)}{||r-r_{q}(t)||^{3}}$$ with $$r_{q}(t)=(0,0,z_{q}(t))$$ (I’m aware this isn’t...
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
Back
Top