Uncovering Hidden Objects: The Power of Diffraction

  • Thread starter Thread starter Loren Booda
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the ability of an observer hidden behind a 90-degree corner to reconstruct an image of an object illuminated by a full spectrum light source, using diffracted light. The effectiveness of this reconstruction is influenced by ambient conditions, the method of data collection, and the nature of light propagation. In a vacuum, no information can be gathered due to the lack of light diffusion, while environments like a clean room or a smoke-filled bar yield varying degrees of observable data. The conversation also touches on the principles of diffraction and interference, particularly in relation to one-slit diffraction, suggesting that reconstruction may be theoretically possible using techniques like Fourier transforms. Ultimately, practical reconstruction from the diffracted light remains a complex challenge.
Loren Booda
Messages
3,108
Reaction score
4
Take an object with well defined features, illuminated by a full spectrum source and located around a sharp, 90 degree vertical corner. How well can an observer hidden behind the corner from the object and at the same height reconstruct its image from the diffracted light?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As well as I can see you now.
 
:smile:
To some extent, it might depend upon ambient conditions. Loren seems to be alluding to the mirage effect, which is very real. I've never heard of it working around a 90 degree bend, though.
 
I would say it's entirely dependant on the mechanism used to collect the data (the diffused light). For example, if the observer used a mirror, he could tell a lot about the object. If he used no instrument, he could tell nothing at all. If the experiment took place in a vacuum, he could tell nothing at all, because light doesn't diffuse in a vacuum.

In a perfectly dust-free "clean room", almost no data. In a smoke-filled bar, color and size perhaps (if the source of illumination were bright enough).
 
Folks,

Pardon, I was referring to diffraction than diffusion. Would that change your answers? Consider the phenomenon in vacuo.
 
If you are observing right on the wall, you would get no information whatsoever. This is because light takes a finite amount of time (and distance) for the diffraction angle to evolve from 0 to whatever the far-field diffraction angle may be.

Claude.
 
In one-slit diffraction, all interference fringes (with the information they represent) but one are not along a straight (classical) path from the light source, through the slit and to the screen. The same argument holds for a object, corner and observer.

All that remains is for the observer to reconstruct the information about the object from the fringes, but can it be done in practice? (Using some kind of Fourier transform?)
 
Remember that this one-slit example is illuminated by a full-spectrum source. The interference displayed on the screen arises from those wavelengths interacting with the geometry of the slit itself. This experiment, as explained above, is analogous to the "corner" situation.
 
Back
Top