Uncovering the Mystery of Undetectable Radio Stations

  • Thread starter Thread starter GiTS
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Numbers
AI Thread Summary
Undetectable radio stations, often referred to as numbers stations, can be challenging to locate due to their high-power broadcasts and the use of steganography, making it difficult to identify the recipient of any coded messages. A retired Naval intelligence officer demonstrated that tracking these stations may require extensive travel and specialized equipment, such as a radio signal direction finder, due to the nature of their operation. These stations serve as placeholders, maintaining frequency availability for potential future use while complicating surveillance efforts for adversaries. The operational efficiency of a numbers station allows it to function with minimal personnel, contrasting with the multiple resources needed for monitoring. Ultimately, the pursuit of uncovering these stations can lead to wasted efforts in deciphering patterns or locating them.
GiTS
Messages
132
Reaction score
0
I read an article on these radio broadcasts whose location is undetectable. The thing is, I thought there was no such thing as an undetectable radio station. Is it because they are broadcasting from so far away that the signal bounces around? I know people can use a signal strength detector to track down tagged animals in the woods. It usually takes no longer than a day to find them. So how can the locating these stations be any different. I read that a retired Naval intelligence officer found one in West Palm by driving hundreds of miles, using a radio signal direction finder. But why did he have to drive so far? Shouldn't a mile distance between receivers be more than enough distance to triangulate a position.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
There is no problem locating or identifying the nationality of number or letter stations. The people doing it are government employees, who for security reasons do not publish the information. The first rule of radio surveillance is; Never transmit. Obviously the second and third rules are the same as the first.

As a high power international broadcast, it is not possible to tell who any embedded code message might be addressed to, or where the recipient might be. It is also not possible to tell if or when a coded message is inserted into the pseudo-random stream. That is an example of steganography. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steganography

It takes less than one person to maintain and operate a numbers station. It takes the opposition several persons to monitor it. A numbers station is a decoy that can waste the time of the enemy, as it is not possible to cryptanalyse a cipher that is used only once for a short message.

One important thing to realize is that a numbers station is a placeholder, it keeps equipment and a radio frequency available in case it is ever needed. As you look more deeply into the radio spectrum you will find there are many other less powerful, but more interesting placeholders masquerading as legitimate international data links. They attract attention away from real clandestine stations.

You can waste a lifetime looking for patterns in the numbers, doing jigsaw puzzles, or locating radio stations.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'How can I find the cleanout for my building drain?'
I am a long distance truck driver, but I recently completed a plumbing program with Stratford Career Institute. In the chapter of my textbook Repairing DWV Systems, the author says that if there is a clog in the building drain, one can clear out the clog by using a snake augur or maybe some other type of tool into the cleanout for the building drain. The author said that the cleanout for the building drain is usually near the stack. I live in a duplex townhouse. Just out of curiosity, I...
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
Back
Top