Undergrad Research (how to make it work for you)

AI Thread Summary
Limited research experience can lead to feelings of dissatisfaction, especially when authorship does not reflect significant contributions to the project's direction. Successful undergraduate research projects often stem from proactive engagement with faculty, as demonstrated by one participant who persistently sought an internship. The importance of thoroughly investigating research sponsors before committing to projects is emphasized, as is the value of having clear goals and a structured approach within a limited timeframe. While some projects may only contribute to larger, ongoing efforts, those with defined objectives tend to yield more meaningful experiences and outcomes. Ultimately, demonstrating dedication and the ability to contribute effectively to research is crucial for gaining admission to reputable graduate programs, even if initial projects do not meet personal expectations.
Phyisab****
Messages
584
Reaction score
2
I have had some limited research experience which resulted in me being a second author on the paper. I was not given any influence on the direction of the work or the actual paper though, and I now consider it to be a poor paper and the work to be completely lacking in direction.

This question is mainly for those who have had very successful undergrad projects, and subsequently went to grad school. How did you become involved in said project? How seriously did you investigate your research sponsor before becoming involved? What do you feel contributed most to the success of your project? Beyond my complete dedication, how can I best prove to the world of physics that I can contribute to this field, and that I have a place at a good grad school?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I did three main research projects as an undergrad. The first one involved me begging one of my professors relentlessly for months before he gave me an internship with him; the second and third were REU programs. I accepted the second without knowing who I would be working for just on the basis of the university it was at, the third I had a basic idea of what I would be doing. Only the second resulted in a publication, and the third turned into my senior thesis. I think the most successful projects are the ones with a set goal and a good idea of how to get to that goal in just two months. Some people will take you on just to work on a piece of a larger project that might never be completed (or at least not while you're there); while those are good for experience they don't give you the whole idea of a research project, from coming up with an idea, figuring out how to implement it, doing so, and writing up the results.
 
Phyisab**** said:
I now consider it to be a poor paper and the work to be completely lacking in direction.

Obviously the referees didn't agree with that assessment.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
82
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top