Understand Angular Momentum - Help from a Teacher for Eraniamayomii

AI Thread Summary
Angular momentum is a vector quantity defined as the mass of a particle multiplied by the cross product of its position and velocity vectors. It is conserved in a closed system, meaning that if no external forces act on it, the total angular momentum remains constant. The discussion highlights practical examples, such as a figure skater spinning faster by pulling in her arms, illustrating the conservation principle. It also notes that real-world factors, like friction, can affect angular momentum over time. Understanding specific terms and concepts is essential for grasping the topic more fully.
Eraniamayomii
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
"In physics, the angular momentum of a particle about an origin is a vector quantity equal to the mass of the particle multiplied by the cross product of the position vector of the particle with its velocity vector. The angular momentum of a system of particles is the sum of that of the particles within it."

This is the basic Wiki definition of angular momentum. I was wondering if someone "perhapse a teacher" could put this into words I understand. I know that this can be translated into a more understandable words.

I firmly ask that you do not tell me to wait until I go to college to study this. I know that I can learn it if I try, and ask enough questions.

Lastly, I'm sorry for my spelling errors. I usually use my cell phone which has spell check. I currently am on my computer though. Please excuse my spelling.


Love,

Eraniamayomii



EDIT:

I'm sorry. Please let me explain what I know about angular momentum.

I know that angular momentum is what makes a ice scater spin faster as she brings her arms in and gets lower to the ground. I know that as a star or planetoid becomes more dense, it gains speed, and as it explands, it loses speed. I also know that the our solar system has slowed down the rotation of the sun due to angular momentum.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The example of a figure skater is conservation of angular momentum. If an object or system of objects is not acted upon by an external force, then angular momentum is conserved. As mentioned in the wiki article, angular momentum is the product of radius times speed. If only internal work is done, then any change in radius requires an inverse change in speed. For example, if the radius is decreased to 1/2 of it's original length, then speed is increased to twice the original speed. This change requires internal work to be done, because angular kinetic energy changes even though angular momentum remains the same. In the figure skater example, internal work is done when the skater pull in her arms, and the amount of work done determines the increase in angular kinetic energy (rotational energy).

Note that the figure skate example only works in the idealized case where there is no friction from the ice. In real life, the rate of rotation decreases over time because friction in the ice applies an external torque to the skate.
 
How about this? In the passage you quoted from Wikipedia, tell us the first word you don't understand, and someone can try to explain it, or at least point you to places where you can read about it. Then we can move on to the next word you don't understand, etc.

It's kind of hard to put things in understandable terms (for you) if we don't have any idea of what, specifically, you don't understand, and what you're capable of understanding with your current background.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top