Understanding Additive Factor Group Q/Z

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter DanielThrice
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Group
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 5K views
DanielThrice
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
If we're considering the additive factor group Q/Z, can we show that Q/Z is the torsion subgroup of R/Z? I'm lost on these.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Alright, so I showed this:


We have that if r+Z is an element of R/Z, and the order of r + Z = n, nr is an element of Z implies that r is an element of Q.

But what about this: Show that Q/Z is isomorphic to the multiplicative group U∗ consisting of all roots of unityin C. (That is, U∗ = {z ∈ C|zn=1 for some n ∈ Z+}.)
 
DanielThrice said:
Alright, so I showed this:


We have that if r+Z is an element of R/Z, and the order of r + Z = n, nr is an element of Z implies that r is an element of Q.

But what about this: Show that Q/Z is isomorphic to the multiplicative group U∗ consisting of all roots of unityin C. (That is, U∗ = {z ∈ C|zn=1 for some n ∈ Z+}.)

what can you say about the map f:Q/Z-->U* given by:

f(q + Z) = e2πiq
 
DanielThrice said:
Alright, so I showed this:


We have that if r+Z is an element of R/Z, and the order of r + Z = n, nr is an element of Z implies that r is an element of Q.

But what about this: Show that Q/Z is isomorphic to the multiplicative group U∗ consisting of all roots of unityin C. (That is, U∗ = {z ∈ C|zn=1 for some n ∈ Z+}.)

you are just restating the same question in different language.
 
DanielThrice said:
If we're considering the additive factor group Q/Z, can we show that Q/Z is the torsion subgroup of R/Z? I'm lost on these.

It is quite easy, let [tex]T[/tex] be the torsion subgroup. It is easy to proove [tex]Q/Z \subseteq T[/tex].

If we have [tex]Q/Z \subset T[/tex] then there is a real number [tex]r \notin Q[/tex] such that [tex]r + Z[/tex] has finite order. This implies [tex]r \in Q[/tex]. Contradiction so [tex]Q/Z = T[/tex].