Understanding Additive Factor Group Q/Z

  • Thread starter Thread starter DanielThrice
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Group
DanielThrice
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
If we're considering the additive factor group Q/Z, can we show that Q/Z is the torsion subgroup of R/Z? I'm lost on these.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Alright, so I showed this:


We have that if r+Z is an element of R/Z, and the order of r + Z = n, nr is an element of Z implies that r is an element of Q.

But what about this: Show that Q/Z is isomorphic to the multiplicative group U∗ consisting of all roots of unityin C. (That is, U∗ = {z ∈ C|zn=1 for some n ∈ Z+}.)
 
DanielThrice said:
Alright, so I showed this:


We have that if r+Z is an element of R/Z, and the order of r + Z = n, nr is an element of Z implies that r is an element of Q.

But what about this: Show that Q/Z is isomorphic to the multiplicative group U∗ consisting of all roots of unityin C. (That is, U∗ = {z ∈ C|zn=1 for some n ∈ Z+}.)

what can you say about the map f:Q/Z-->U* given by:

f(q + Z) = e2πiq
 
DanielThrice said:
Alright, so I showed this:


We have that if r+Z is an element of R/Z, and the order of r + Z = n, nr is an element of Z implies that r is an element of Q.

But what about this: Show that Q/Z is isomorphic to the multiplicative group U∗ consisting of all roots of unityin C. (That is, U∗ = {z ∈ C|zn=1 for some n ∈ Z+}.)

you are just restating the same question in different language.
 
DanielThrice said:
If we're considering the additive factor group Q/Z, can we show that Q/Z is the torsion subgroup of R/Z? I'm lost on these.

It is quite easy, let T be the torsion subgroup. It is easy to proove Q/Z \subseteq T.

If we have Q/Z \subset T then there is a real number r \notin Q such that r + Z has finite order. This implies r \in Q. Contradiction so Q/Z = T.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top