Understanding and Solving Electrostatics Problems: Tips and Techniques

  • Thread starter Thread starter Murgs2012
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electrostatics
AI Thread Summary
To solve electrostatics problems, it's essential to determine if the electric field is static or dynamic. The equation ∇×E = -∂B/∂t indicates that in electrostatic conditions, this value is zero, confirming no magnetic field is present. If the electric field satisfies Gauss' law, ∇·E = ρ/ε, it can be categorized as electrostatic, allowing for the calculation of charge density. Conversely, if the field is time-varying, the relationship becomes more complex, requiring integration to find the magnetic field influencing the electric field. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately addressing electrostatics problems.
Murgs2012
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


exams.JPG


Any ideas on the way to approach them problems would be appreciated really.



Homework Equations



Assuming it has something to do with ∇.E=ρ/ε or ∫E.ds=Q/ε to see if the divergence of the E fields given satisfy them conditions, if not use ∇xE=-dB/dt or ∫E.dl=-d/dt∫(Bds)

The Attempt at a Solution


no idea how to approach it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are on the right way track with
\vec{\nabla}\times\vec{E} =-\frac{\partial\vec{B}}{\partial t}
For an electrostatic configuration there are no moving charges and hence no magnetic field. Knowing this, what will this equation become then?
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
So for that equation in an electrostatic field ∇xE=0, and that would be the way to determine if it's electrostatic or not?
If it's electrostatic would you then use Gauss' law ∇.E=ρ/ε to find the charge density that creates this field.

If it's not electrostatic would the non zero result found for ∇xE= -dB/dt, so integrate with respect to time to determine the magnetic field that causes the electric field?
 
How about del dot D = rho?
(D = epsilon E).
 
That's how we'd find the charge density Rho isn't it? But that's only part of the question, it was how to know if it was an electrostatic field that was annoying me
 
Murgs2012 said:
That's how we'd find the charge density Rho isn't it? But that's only part of the question, it was how to know if it was an electrostatic field that was annoying me

OK, I guess I assumed E0 was a constant. Then E is not a function of time and so must be electrostatic if it obeys the Poisson equation. Same for part c.

If E0 can be time-varying then it's more complicated.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top