Understanding Arbitrary Constants in Second Order Nonhomogeneous Equations

jason17349
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
The following equation was derived from a RLC circuit:

\frac{d^2}{dt^2} (V(t)) + 6 \frac{d}{dt} (V(t)) + 5V(t) = 40

Setting up the equation:

s^2 +6s + 5 = 0

yields s = -1 and s = -5

Giving me the general equation:

V(t) = k_{1}e^{-t} + k_{2}e^{-5t}

But the general equation shown in the solution is:

V(t) = k_{1}e^{-t} + k_{2}e^{-5t} + k_{3}

It's been a little while since my differential equations class and I'm not sure where the k3 comes from. Is it because the equation is nonhomogeneous and if that's the case will all second order nonhomogeneous equations that equal a constant have similar general equations?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes it is because is nonhomogenous, the particular solution for this equation will have been 8. v(t)_{p} = 8
 
Last edited:
Shouldn't k_{3}=8 ??

Daniel.
 
Okay guys I got it, thanks for your help. And yes k_{3} = 8
 
V(t) = k_{1}e^{-t} + k_{2}e^{-5t} + k_{3}

In my opinion, that is really bad notation! The fact that the same symbol is used for k_1, k_2, k_3 implies that they are to be treated the same. In fact, k1 and k2 are arbitrary constants while k3 must be 8.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top