Understanding Arbitrary Constants in Second Order Nonhomogeneous Equations

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the derivation and understanding of arbitrary constants in the context of a second-order nonhomogeneous differential equation derived from an RLC circuit. The equation presented involves the function V(t) and its derivatives, leading to a characteristic equation and general solution that includes arbitrary constants.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the origin of the constant k3 in the general solution, questioning its necessity due to the nonhomogeneous nature of the equation. There is also discussion about whether all second-order nonhomogeneous equations that equal a constant will have similar general forms.

Discussion Status

The conversation has progressed with some participants confirming the role of k3 as a particular solution, while others express concerns about the notation used for the constants. There appears to be a mix of understanding and confusion regarding the treatment of arbitrary constants in the solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants are reflecting on their prior knowledge from differential equations classes and the implications of nonhomogeneous equations on the general solution form. There is an indication that the notation may lead to misunderstandings about the constants involved.

jason17349
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
The following equation was derived from a RLC circuit:

\frac{d^2}{dt^2} (V(t)) + 6 \frac{d}{dt} (V(t)) + 5V(t) = 40

Setting up the equation:

s^2 +6s + 5 = 0

yields s = -1 and s = -5

Giving me the general equation:

V(t) = k_{1}e^{-t} + k_{2}e^{-5t}

But the general equation shown in the solution is:

V(t) = k_{1}e^{-t} + k_{2}e^{-5t} + k_{3}

It's been a little while since my differential equations class and I'm not sure where the k3 comes from. Is it because the equation is nonhomogeneous and if that's the case will all second order nonhomogeneous equations that equal a constant have similar general equations?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes it is because is nonhomogenous, the particular solution for this equation will have been 8. v(t)_{p} = 8
 
Last edited:
Okay guys I got it, thanks for your help. And yes k_{3} = 8
 
V(t) = k_{1}e^{-t} + k_{2}e^{-5t} + k_{3}

In my opinion, that is really bad notation! The fact that the same symbol is used for k_1, k_2, k_3 implies that they are to be treated the same. In fact, k1 and k2 are arbitrary constants while k3 must be 8.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
903
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K