Understanding Beam Deflection in Double Cantilever Beams

AI Thread Summary
In a double cantilever beam fixed at both ends, deflection increases with length due to the longer moment arm for applied loads. Conversely, deflection decreases with increased width and thickness because these dimensions enhance the beam's moment of inertia, distributing stress more effectively. The relationship between deflection and these dimensions is rooted in the physics of beam mechanics, where a larger moment of inertia leads to reduced deflection under load. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding these geometric properties rather than relying solely on formulas. Overall, increasing thickness and width mitigates deflection by improving structural rigidity.
Tammy....
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Can someone please tell me why in a double cantilever beam (fixed at both ends) the deflection increases when the length increases, the defelction decreases when the width increases and the deflection decreases when the thickness increases. I don't want to no why it does these in relation to the formula... just the physics part of it... thanx

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Tammy... said:

Homework Statement



Can someone please tell me why in a double cantilever beam (fixed at both ends) the deflection increases when the length increases, the defelction decreases when the width increases and the deflection decreases when the thickness increases. I don't want to no why it does these in relation to the formula... just the physics part of it... thanx
Tammy, I'm not sure what you mean by the 'physics' part of it; for a given load and end conditions, the deflection of any beam will increase when its length increases or when its width or depth (its area moment of inertia) decreases, per the deflection formula which is a function of load, boundary conditions, material elasticity, and the geometric properties of the beam. Are you looking for the math behind the physics? If this is a homework question, can you be a bit more specific and show some attempt at answering your own question?
 
Um... well its for an assignment... does the deflection decrease when the thickness and width increase becasue there is more area... like there is less stress because it is spread over a larger area which would cause less deflection?
 
Tammy... said:
Um... well its for an assignment... does the deflection decrease when the thickness and width increase becasue there is more area... like there is less stress because it is spread over a larger area which would cause less deflection?
That's pretty much correct, except, to be technically correct, you should substitute the word "area (A)'' with the term "moment of inertia (I)". In beams subjected to bending loads, both stress and deflection are functions of I, not A, although I and A are related.
 
oh ok... Thanks heaps for your help :)
 
what do you want an experiment in a laboratory ,or what?
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top