Understanding Chiral Symmetry in QCD for Heavy Ion Collisions

nf405
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I'm doing a dissertation on heavy ion collisions and one of the things they look for in the collisions is chiral symmetry resolution - what is it?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I understand that it is a type of symmetry that is usually broken but QCD predicts that it shouldn't break at high energies (like in a heavy ion collision) just not sure what sort of symmetry it is - Is it that you can't tell the difference between our universe and a mirror image of our universe or something?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nf405 said:

Homework Statement



I'm doing a dissertation on heavy ion collisions and one of the things they look for in the collisions is chiral symmetry resolution - what is it?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I understand that it is a type of symmetry that is usually broken but QCD predicts that it shouldn't break at high energies (like in a heavy ion collision) just not sure what sort of symmetry it is - Is it that you can't tell the difference between our universe and a mirror image of our universe or something?

No, it's a symmetry due to the fact that arises when the masses of the quarks can be set to zero (for example when the energies involved are very large). Depending on the situation, this can be done for the masses of up and dow or up,down and strange etc.

I would suggest that you ask the question in the high energy/particle physics forum to get more feedback.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top