Understanding Christoffel Identity and its Application in Differential Geometry

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the Christoffel identity using the relationship between the metric tensor and the basis vectors in differential geometry. It begins with the expression for the derivative of the metric tensor and incorporates the Christoffel symbols. Participants suggest using the symmetry of the Christoffel symbols to derive three equations that lead to a simplified form of the identity. The final steps involve contracting the resulting equations with the inverse metric tensor to arrive at the desired expression for the Christoffel symbols. This process highlights the interplay between the metric and Christoffel symbols in understanding geometric properties.
etotheipi
Homework Statement
We need to show that ##\Gamma_{cb}^e = \frac{1}{2}g^{ea}(\partial_c g_{ab} + \partial_b g_{ac} - \partial_a g_{cb})##
Relevant Equations
N/A
We use ##g_{\alpha \beta} = \vec{e}_{\alpha} \cdot \vec{e}_{\beta}## to show that$$\partial_c g_{ab} = \partial_c (\vec{e}_a \cdot \vec{e}_b) = \vec{e}_a \cdot \partial_c \vec{e}_b + \vec{e}_b \cdot \partial_c \vec{e}_a$$then because ##\partial_{\alpha} \vec{e}_{\beta} := \Gamma_{\alpha \beta}^{\gamma} \vec{e}_{\gamma}##, we get$$\begin{align*}\partial_c g_{ab} = \vec{e}_a \cdot \Gamma_{cb}^{d} \vec{e}_{d} + \vec{e}_b \cdot \Gamma_{ca}^{d} \vec{e}_{d}

&= \Gamma_{cb}^{d} \vec{e}_a \cdot \vec{e}_d + \Gamma_{ca}^{d} \vec{e}_b \cdot \vec{e}_d \\

&= \Gamma_{cb}^{d} g_{ad} + \Gamma_{ca}^{d} g_{bd}

\end{align*}$$Now I am uncertain as to how to proceed. I wonder if someone can give me a hint? I try contracting both sides with ##g^{ea}## but I can't see how that helps. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not certain what you know about Christoffel symbols at this point. If you are allowed to use that ##\Gamma^a_{bc}=\Gamma^a_{cb}## then you can permute the indices in your last expression and use that symmetry to get three equations in three terms like ##\Gamma^\cdot_{\cdot\cdot}g_{\cdot\cdot}##. That ought to get you where you're going.
 
  • Like
Likes etotheipi
Thanks! I'll write out my solution then, using this fact about symmetry in the downstairs indices of the Christoffel symbols,$$\begin{align*}
\partial_c g_{ab} &= \Gamma_{bc}^d g_{ad} + \Gamma_{ca}^d g_{bd} \\
\partial_b g_{ca} &= \Gamma_{ab}^d g_{cd} + \Gamma_{bc}^d g_{ad} \\
\partial_a g_{bc} &= \Gamma_{ca}^d g_{bd} + \Gamma_{ab}^d g_{cd}
\end{align*}$$It follows that$$\partial_c g_{ab} + \partial_b g_{ca} - \partial_a g_{bc} = 2\Gamma_{bc}^d g_{ad}$$Now I halve both sides, and contract both sides with ##g^{ea}##, making use of the identity ##g^{\alpha \beta}g_{\beta \gamma} = \delta^{\alpha}_{\gamma}##,$$\frac{1}{2} g^{ea} \left(\partial_c g_{ab} + \partial_b g_{ca} - \partial_a g_{bc} \right) = \Gamma_{bc}^d g^{ea} g_{ad} = \Gamma^e_{bc}$$Nice! Muchas gracias señor Ibix!
 
  • Like
Likes PhDeezNutz and Ibix
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top