Understanding Complex Numbers: Squaring and Simplifying

Master J
Messages
219
Reaction score
0
Hey guys.

So, complex numbers.

Its been a while since I've dealt with them. I've been wondering a few things about them.

When expressed in the form a + ib, is there a particular way that you square them?

And when you have a rational number, with an i term on the bottom, how exactly do you go about simplifying it into non rational form?


Cheers guys. I'm fairly rusty when it comes to the complex numbers. Hope this will clear some things up for me. I need to be fairly sharp at them now that I'm doing Physical Optics.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You can treat the i like another variable. When you multiply two complex numbers, let's say a+ib and c+id, it is just like multiplying two binomials:

(a+ib)(c+id) = ac + aid + ibc + i2bd = (ac-bd) + i(bc+ad).

As for division (in the case of your rational number), what you want to do is to make the denominator real by multiplying top and bottom by the complex conjugate. For example, suppose you have (a+ib)/(c+id). The complex conjugate of c+id is c-id (the sign of the imaginary part is switched). When you multiply top and bottom by c-id, you will get:

[(ac+bd) + i(bc-ad)] / (c2 + d2)

The denominator is real, so you basically just have the solution as a complex number.
 
Cheers for the help. To make sure I have this, could someone perhaps show hoe this is separated into the form a + i b:


u - 1 = [N(e^2)] / [vm(g^2 - w^2 -iyw)]

Real: 1 + N(e^2)(g^2 - w^2) / [vm[(g^2 - w^2)^2 + (yw)^2]]


Imaginary: N(e^2)yw / [vm[(g^2 - w^2)^2 + (yw)^2]]
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top