Understanding Elastic Collisions: Solving a Head-On Collision Problem

AI Thread Summary
In an elastic collision problem, a 6 gram ball moving north at 3 m/s collides with an identical ball moving south at 2 m/s, resulting in the first ball moving south at 1 m/s. The key issue raised is the apparent contradiction in energy conservation, as the expected velocity of the second ball is questioned. The solution guide suggests the second ball moves off at 2.0 m/s, which leads to confusion regarding energy conservation principles. Participants express skepticism about the problem's wording and its implications for physical laws. Clarification is sought on whether the problem is misworded or if it presents an unrealistic scenario in physics.
cybernerd
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 6 gram ball moving north at a rate of 3 m/s collides head on with an identical ball moving south at 2.0 m/s. The collision is elastic and the first ball moves south at 1 m/s. What is the velocity of the second ball?

Homework Equations



Law of conservation of momentum.
p=mv

The Attempt at a Solution



The question makes no sense to me. According to my solution guide, the other ball moves off at 2.0 m/s. But of the collision is elastic, then no energy should be wasted. So...2.0m/s worth of energy from the first ball is sucked into an abyss? Can anyone shed light on this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yeah I don't know about this one. Energy's definitely not conserved using the given data. Chalk it up to a miswording?
 
I hope so, or we're getting into magic rather than physics...thanks for confirming this...
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Back
Top