Understanding Energy and Kinetic Equations: A Quick Question Answered

  • Thread starter Thread starter linnus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy
AI Thread Summary
K in the equation K=1/2mv^2 represents the kinetic energy of an object with mass m and velocity v, not the change in kinetic energy. To determine the change in kinetic energy, one must calculate the difference between final and initial kinetic energy, expressed as Kfinal - Kinitial, which equals the total work done (Wtotal). The discussion also touches on potential energy, emphasizing that only changes in energy can be calculated, and absolute kinetic energy requires an arbitrary reference point for a body at rest. The conversation highlights the importance of defining a reference value for kinetic energy when considering a stationary object. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurately analyzing energy transformations in physics.
linnus
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
When they say K=1/2mv^2 does K mean the change of kinetic energy? because Wtotal= the change of kinetic energy...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
linnus said:
When they say K=1/2mv^2 does K mean the change of kinetic energy? because Wtotal= the change of kinetic energy...

1/2 mv^2 gives the kinetic energy of an object with mass m moving with velocity v. To find the change in kinetic energy, one would have to solve for Kfinal - Kinitial, which would be equal to the Wtotal of which you speak.
 
to calculate change in K.E we have formula 0.5*mass*(v*v-u*u)...
think about potential energy
we can calculate only change (d)
and arbitarily assume U at some point and express potential energy as
d+U(initial)=U(final).
actualy we can perform only relative analysis
and therefore diff of K.E of a moving body velocity v with respect to body at rest can be obtained by substituting u=0..

but to calculate absolute K.E we must take an arbitarily some value of K.E for body at rest...and then add it to the difference

and so what do you think is most appropriate, logical & convinient value to be given to the body at rest .??


well your question was good but a bit vague inexpression I think..:smile:
 
Last edited:
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Back
Top