Understanding Energy of a Signal: Integral & Absolute Value Sign

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the mathematical definition of the energy of a signal, specifically the integral of the magnitude of the signal squared, expressed as ∫(|f(t)|^2). It clarifies that for real-valued functions, the absolute value does not affect the outcome since squaring the function eliminates the need for absolute values. For complex-valued functions, the magnitude squared is defined as |f|^2 = p^2 + q^2, where f(t) = p(t) + i*q(t). The conversation highlights the simplicity of these concepts once understood, emphasizing the distinction between trivial and complex math problems. Understanding these principles is crucial for analyzing signal energy effectively.
cybernoodles
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi All,

I am confused about what is meant in the mathematical definition for the energy of a signal. Why is it the integral of the magnitude of the signal squared?

∫(|f(t)|^2)

How do I deal with the absolute value sign? I do not have much experience with absolute value signs in integrals. I did do a search but am still confused. How do I even know if a function will need to be readjusted according to the absolute value sign and, if so, how do I rewrite the function so that it obeys the absolute value condition?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
If f(t) is a real-valued function the absolute values just "go away", because |f\,|^2 = |f\,| \times |f\,| = f\,{}^2
is always true - it doesn't matter whether f is positive, negative, or zero.

If f is a complex-valued function and f(t) = p(t) + i\,q(t), then
|f\,|^2 = p^2 + q^2
 
Wow that was so simple. Thanks!
 
cybernoodles said:
Wow that was so simple.

Somebody once said, "There are only two types of math problem: the trivial ones that you know how to solve, and the impossible ones that you don't" :smile:
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top