Understanding Forces: Bird Wings, Air Displacement, and Conservation of Momentum

  • Thread starter Thread starter qazxsw11111
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the mechanics of bird flight, specifically the relationship between wing flapping, air displacement, and momentum conservation. The user presents two equations related to the forces acting on a bird while hovering, questioning their validity. Participants point out that only one equation has matching units, indicating a misunderstanding of the principles involved. They clarify that the equation (vAp)(g)=mg does not align with Newton's Third Law and lacks physical sense. The conversation emphasizes the importance of unit consistency in physics equations.
qazxsw11111
Messages
95
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone! Ok, so we have a bird which is flapping its wings. Avg speed of air displaced is v. Area of wings is A. Density of air is p.

Thus mass of air displaced per second is vAp.

This is ok.

However, according to conservation of momentum, (vAp)(v)=mg, where m is mass of bird

Also however, according to Newton's Third Law, Force everted by bird on air=Force exerted on air by bird, (vAp)(g)=mg ?

Is there a mistake in my understanding?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
qazxsw11111 said:
Also however, according to Newton's Third Law, Force everted by bird on air=Force exerted on air by bird
So what's the problem with that?
 
I mean like there are two different equations to ma when the bird is hovering in air.

vApg=ma and v(Apv)=ma

Which is correct?
 
qazxsw11111 said:
vApg=ma and v(Apv)=ma
Check your units. Only one of those equations has units that match. (I assumed it was just a typo before. How did you get that highlighted equation?)
 
Well, according to Newton's Third Law, Force everted by bird on air=Force exerted on air by bird, (vAp)(g)=mg

I know this is wrong, but why is it?
 
qazxsw11111 said:
Well, according to Newton's Third Law, Force everted by bird on air=Force exerted on air by bird,
That's certainly true.
(vAp)(g)=mg
Where did you get this from? It certainly doesn't follow from Newton's 3rd law. (Note that this equation makes no physical sense, since the units do not match across the equal sign.)
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
Back
Top