Understanding Gauss's Law and Electric Field Distributions

  • Thread starter Thread starter PhysicsNewb
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around three problems related to Gauss's Law and electric fields. For the first problem, the only correct statement is that the electric field outside a spherical conductor is the same as that of a uniformly charged nonconducting sphere. In the second problem, the correct answer is that Gauss's law cannot be easily applied to a charged nonconducting cube, not a long straight line of charge. The third problem's correct answers involve adding a point charge +Q at the origin and a point charge -Q at (2R, 0) to double the field strength at point P. The participants engage in clarifying the reasoning behind their answers and the implications of different charge distributions on electric fields.
PhysicsNewb
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi, I had three problems to do that are multiple choice, here they are and my answer with them. Please tell me if some are wrong.

1. Spherical conductor of radius R carries char +Q, which statement(s) are correct?

I. Electric field outside the surface of the conductor is the same as the field outside a uniformly charged nonconducting sphere of same radius and charge

II. Electric field inside the surface of the conductor is the same as the field inside a uniformly charged nonconducting sphere of same radius and charge

III. Nonspherical Gaussian surface drawn within the conductor will have a ney electric flux through it

I said that only statement I. was correct.


2. Gauss's law could easily be used to solve for the electric field outside all of the following charge distributions except

A.) charged nonconducting sphere
B.) long straight line of charge
C.) long charged conducting cylinder
D.) charged nonconducting cube
E.) charged nonconducting plane

I chose B. was correct.

3. Uniformly charged nonconducting sphere of radius R, charge +Q, is centered at the origin of a cartesian plane. Field strength at Point P with coordinates (R,0) just outside the surface will double if:

I. Add a point charge +Q at the origin
II. Add a point charge -Q at point (2R, 0)
III. Add a uniformly charged nonconducting sphere with charge -Q and radius 1/2R with its center at the point (2R, O)

I chose I. only as the answer.

Are these right? If not, please help..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
PhysicsNewb said:
1. Spherical conductor of radius R carries char +Q, which statement(s) are correct?

I. Electric field outside the surface of the conductor is the same as the field outside a uniformly charged nonconducting sphere of same radius and charge

II. Electric field inside the surface of the conductor is the same as the field inside a uniformly charged nonconducting sphere of same radius and charge

III. Nonspherical Gaussian surface drawn within the conductor will have a ney electric flux through it

I said that only statement I. was correct.
Right.

2. Gauss's law could easily be used to solve for the electric field outside all of the following charge distributions except

A.) charged nonconducting sphere
B.) long straight line of charge
C.) long charged conducting cylinder
D.) charged nonconducting cube
E.) charged nonconducting plane

I chose B. was correct.
Incorrect. Hint: Which charge distribution lacks a simple symmetry?

3. Uniformly charged nonconducting sphere of radius R, charge +Q, is centered at the origin of a cartesian plane. Field strength at Point P with coordinates (R,0) just outside the surface will double if:

I. Add a point charge +Q at the origin
II. Add a point charge -Q at point (2R, 0)
III. Add a uniformly charged nonconducting sphere with charge -Q and radius 1/2R with its center at the point (2R, O)

I chose I. only as the answer.
Incorrect. Add the contributions from each charge to find the new field at point P.
 
I'm going to revise my answers to make number 2. answer D and number 3 answer's I. and II. I think i worked it right this time.
 
Last edited:
PhysicsNewb said:
I'm going to revise my answers to make number 2. answer D and number 3 answer's I. and II.
For question 3, what's the difference between answers II and III (as far as the field at point P is concerned)?
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top