Understanding Genetic Similarity: Dawkin's Perspective on Family Lines

  • Thread starter Thread starter Phobos
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relationships
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around genetic similarity as described by Richard Dawkins in "The Selfish Gene," particularly focusing on how genetic relationships diminish over generations. Participants explore the implications of this genetic similarity in relation to family lines and the average human genome, questioning at what point an individual's genetic similarity to their ancestors becomes indistinguishable from that of a stranger.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the threshold at which genetic similarity to family members becomes equivalent to that of the general population, seeking to quantify this in terms of generations.
  • Another participant humorously connects the topic to moral considerations regarding relationships among distant relatives.
  • A participant reiterates the original question about genetic similarity and introduces the idea of a dilution effect over generations, suggesting that knowledge of allelic variation could help calculate the number of generations needed.
  • One participant proposes that the similarity in nuclear DNA between any two people is approximately 99.9%, leading to a rough estimate of about 10 generations for genetic similarity to diminish significantly, while questioning the simplicity of this comparison.
  • Another participant acknowledges the assumption of no inbreeding in the calculation of genetic similarity, suggesting that this may not hold true historically.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of genetic similarity and its relevance to genealogy, with no consensus reached on the exact number of generations or the validity of the assumptions made in the calculations.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include assumptions about inbreeding and the complexity of genetic variation among individuals, which may affect the calculations and conclusions drawn.

Phobos
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
1,958
Reaction score
7
In Dawkin's book "The Selfish Gene", he discusses genetic relationships in family lines (e.g., your genetic similarity is 1/2 that of one of your parents, 1/4 of your grandparents, etc.). He mentioned that going back only a few generations, your genetic similarity to your family line is no different to than it is to the rest of the population.* At what point is that genetic similarity reached? In other words, what is my genetic similarity to the average human genome? In other other words, how many great-great-greats do I need to trace back before my ancestor is no different than a total stranger?

* Making extensive genealogy somewhat pointless?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Thats a very good question. It could finally help us answer the age old problem- how distant must a relation be before I can sleep with her without it being immoral?
 
As in chess?

Phobos said:
In Dawkin's book "The Selfish Gene", he discusses genetic relationships in family lines (e.g., your genetic similarity is 1/2 that of one of your parents, 1/4 of your grandparents, etc.). He mentioned that going back only a few generations, your genetic similarity to your family line is no different to than it is to the rest of the population.* At what point is that genetic similarity reached? In other words, what is my genetic similarity to the average human genome? In other other words, how many great-great-greats do I need to trace back before my ancestor is no different than a total stranger?

* Making extensive genealogy somewhat pointless?
That remember the classic prize to the chess inventor (although with negative exponent). In this case there would be a dilutional effect of similarities growing exponentially with the number of generations going back. I don't know which is the % of allelic variation among human beings. Such knowledge could allow to calculate n. Are you in agreement?
 
I’ll take a stab at answering my own question…

Seems that different DNA sequences have different frequencies in the human gene pool, so perhaps a general comparison for the whole genome may be a bit tricky. But I seem to recall hearing from the Human Genome project that the similarity in genes of nuclear DNA between any two people is about 99.9%. That’s a 1/1000th difference, which works out to about 10 generations (1/2 gene similarity to parents, to grandparents, 1/8 to great grandparents, etc.)

Sound about right? Or is that 99.9% comparison too simplistic?

10 generations is only about 200-400 years of history...so perhaps genealogy is not a lost cause after all. :)

matthyaouw - I'll leave the morality question to you. :) But my calculation assumes no imbreeding...which is probably a poor assumption given the historical tendency for people to marry their cousins.

ryokan - Sure. My calculation above for determining 'n' generations is 1/(2^n) = 1/1000...so, n is about 10.
 

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
10K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
7K