Understanding Hadron Structure through Electron-Positron Collisions

  • Thread starter Thread starter maverick280857
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hadron Structure
maverick280857
Messages
1,774
Reaction score
5
Hi,

Halzen and Martin, on page 18 of their book, describe the resolution of hadron structure using virtual photons obtained by annihilating e+ and e- beams.

In Figure 1.11(b), isn't the positron arrow shown wrongly? It seems to be moving forward in time. (Or maybe I'm just being picky here?)

They go on to say,

Colliding very high-energy electron and positron beams also provides us with an extremely "clean" technique to probe quarks (see Fig. 1.11b). The photon, produced at rest by e+ and e- beams colliding head on, can decay into a qqbar pair as shown in the pictuire.

What does "produced at rest" mean?

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
maverick280857 said:
In Figure 1.11(b), isn't the positron arrow shown wrongly? It seems to be moving forward in time. (Or maybe I'm just being picky here?)
It depends on one's convention, but it is inconsistent with their e+e- annihilation diagram 6.13
maverick280857 said:
What does "produced at rest" mean?
It means it has no momentum in the lab.
 
humanino said:
It depends on one's convention, but it is inconsistent with their e+e- annihilation diagram 6.13
It means it has no momentum in the lab.

Thanks, I guess time runs vertically here.
 
maverick280857 said:
Thanks, I guess time runs vertically here.

Actually I was confused. There is no inconsistency. Time always flows horizontally from left to right it seems. Also, it seems the arrow always points in the direction of positive energy.
 
Nah, the problem is it's not a Feynman diagram, its a particle flow diagram. The arrows here basically correspond to particle flow. They're just trying to show that an e+ coming in and an e- coming in annihilate.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top