Understanding how a projectile that moves in a parabolic path

  • Thread starter Thread starter tatiana
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Path Projectile
AI Thread Summary
In projectile motion, the acceleration vector (a) is always directed downward due to gravity, while the velocity vector (v) changes direction as the projectile follows a parabolic path. The discussion centers on understanding the conditions under which these two vectors can be parallel or perpendicular. It is clarified that at the peak of the trajectory, the velocity is horizontal, making it perpendicular to the downward acceleration. The conversation also questions the unusual thread title, suggesting it may not accurately reflect the complexity of the topic. Understanding these relationships is crucial for analyzing projectile motion effectively.
tatiana
Messages
43
Reaction score
1
I need help understanding how a projectile that moves in a parabolic path can have a point where a-> is parallel to v-> or perpendictular to v->
Is this meaning that the lines tanget to the path are perpendicular or the actuall path?
And i would think that both parallel and perpendicluar are ppossible, yes?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Why the unusual thread title?
Looks like a password :)
 


tatiana said:
I need help understanding how a projectile that moves in a parabolic path can have a point where a-> is parallel to v-> or perpendictular to v->
Is this meaning that the lines tanget to the path are perpendicular or the actuall path?
And i would think that both parallel and perpendicluar are ppossible, yes?
Well, a is always pointing downard. So what would it mean for v to be either parallel or perpendicular to that?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top