Understanding how a projectile that moves in a parabolic path

  • Thread starter Thread starter tatiana
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Path Projectile
AI Thread Summary
In projectile motion, the acceleration vector (a) is always directed downward due to gravity, while the velocity vector (v) changes direction as the projectile follows a parabolic path. The discussion centers on understanding the conditions under which these two vectors can be parallel or perpendicular. It is clarified that at the peak of the trajectory, the velocity is horizontal, making it perpendicular to the downward acceleration. The conversation also questions the unusual thread title, suggesting it may not accurately reflect the complexity of the topic. Understanding these relationships is crucial for analyzing projectile motion effectively.
tatiana
Messages
43
Reaction score
1
I need help understanding how a projectile that moves in a parabolic path can have a point where a-> is parallel to v-> or perpendictular to v->
Is this meaning that the lines tanget to the path are perpendicular or the actuall path?
And i would think that both parallel and perpendicluar are ppossible, yes?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Why the unusual thread title?
Looks like a password :)
 


tatiana said:
I need help understanding how a projectile that moves in a parabolic path can have a point where a-> is parallel to v-> or perpendictular to v->
Is this meaning that the lines tanget to the path are perpendicular or the actuall path?
And i would think that both parallel and perpendicluar are ppossible, yes?
Well, a is always pointing downard. So what would it mean for v to be either parallel or perpendicular to that?
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top