Understanding Initial Velocity in Free Fall: The Role of Perspective

AI Thread Summary
When a person descending at 1m/s drops a ball, the ball begins its free fall with an initial velocity of 1m/s relative to the ground, not 0m/s. This is due to the principle of inertia, which states that the ball retains its velocity at the moment of release. The initial velocity is perceived differently depending on the observer's frame of reference: it is 0m/s for the descending person and 1m/s for someone stationary on the ground. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding relative motion in physics. Thus, both perspectives are valid based on the observer's location.
Flutterguy123
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Say a person was descending at constant rate of 1m/s while holding a ball. Then, without stopping, the person dropped the ball which assumed a free fall. Would the ball assume an initial velocity of 0m/s, or would it start at the one 1m/s that the person is traveling?

If anyone can, please provide some sort of scientific or mathematic principle, experimental evidence, etc.

Thank you to anyone who can try to help. :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Flutterguy123 said:
Say a person was descending at constant rate of 1m/s while holding a ball. Then, without stopping, the person dropped the ball which assumed a free fall. Would the ball assume an initial velocity of 0m/s, or would it start at the one 1m/s that the person is traveling?

If anyone can, please provide some sort of scientific or mathematic principle, experimental evidence, etc.

Thank you to anyone who can try to help. :)

The ball would start its free fall with a velocity of 1 meter/second relative to the surface of the earth, and a velocity of zero meters/second relative to the descending person. You can calculate this directly from the relationship between velocity and acceleration: ##v(t)=v_0+at## where ##v_0## is the speed when ##t=0##. The trick is that the value of ##v_0## will be different for the descending person and someone standing on the surface of the earth, which is why the word "relative" above is so important.

That's the math. The physical intuition behind it is inertia and Newton's first law: The ball was moving at one meter per second while it was in my hand; inertia says it's still moving at that speed at the moment that my hand releases its grip, and gravity can only speed it up from there.
 
  • Like
Likes Flutterguy123
Nugatory said:
The ball would start its free fall with a velocity of 1 meter/second relative to the surface of the earth, and a velocity of zero meters/second relative to the descending person. You can calculate this directly from the relationship between velocity and acceleration: v(t)=v0+atv(t)=v_0+at where v0v_0 is the speed when t=0t=0. The trick is that the value of v0v_0 will be different for the descending person and someone standing on the surface of the earth, which is why the word "relative" above is so important.

That's the math. The physical intuition behind it is inertia and Newton's first law: The ball was moving at one meter per second while it was in my hand; inertia says it's still moving at that speed at the moment that my hand releases its grip, and gravity can only speed it up from there.

My question is from a similar question that asks the final velocity of the ball after 2.5 seconds, and the book said that the initial velocity would be 0m/s while I and a few other students speculated that the extra velocity from the persons descent should be added to the final velocity.

Now I see that both answers are right depending on the perspective.
From the persons perspective: the initial velocity would be 0m/s.

From a person on the grounds perspective: the initial velocity would be 1m/s and need to be added to the final velocity.

Thank you Nugatory. (:
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top