Understanding Maxwell's Equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter robert25pl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Maxwell's equations
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding Maxwell's equations in free space, particularly the conditions for electric (E) and magnetic (B) fields. It emphasizes that for E and B to exist in free space, certain equations must hold true, specifically that divergence of B equals zero and the curl of E must equal the negative time derivative of B. Daniel presents specific field equations and seeks to verify their compliance with Maxwell's equations, leading to confusion over the calculations of curl and divergence. A participant points out an error in Daniel's calculations, highlighting that the equations must satisfy Maxwell's system identically. The conversation underscores the importance of correctly applying Maxwell's equations to ensure valid field configurations.
robert25pl
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
I want to make sure that I understand this good.
Given E and B are possible in a region of free space (J=0) only if \triangledown \times E=0 and \triangledown \cdot B = 0
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That \vec{B} needs to be stationary (time independent)...Else \vec{E} would not be a purely potential-derived field.

Daniel.
 
I have this two equations:

E=3\sin(3z-6t) \vec{k}
B=- \frac{1}{15} \sin(3z-6t) \vec{j}

So what should I do first?
 
Verify whether such a field configuration satisfies the eqn-s

\nabla\cdot\vec{B}=0

\nabla\times\vec{E}=-\frac{\partial \vec{B}}{\partial t}

Isn't this what u're supposed to do?:confused:

Daniel.
 
robert25pl said:
So what should I do first?

That depends on the question you're supposed to be answering. :confused:
 
"Free space" means \rho={\color{red}0} and \vec\jmath={\color{red}\vec 0}.
So, in two of Maxwell's Equations, this means that
\nabla \cdot \vec E=\rho ={\color{red}\ 0} and
\nabla \times \vec B=\vec \jmath + \frac{\partial \vec E}{\partial t}={\color{red}\ \vec 0} + \frac{\partial \vec E}{\partial t}.
Of course, [from the other two equations] we must always have
\nabla \cdot \vec B= 0 and
\nabla \times \vec E= -\frac{\partial \vec B}{\partial t}

[Insert your own conventional constants]
 
Last edited:
What?! When we were taught Maxwell's equations in free space, we were told that: \nabla \cdot \vec E=\frac{\rho}{\epsilon_{0}}, as free space meant in air not in any sort of medium.
 
Nylex said:
What?! When we were taught Maxwell's equations in free space, we were told that: \nabla \cdot \vec E=\frac{\rho}{\epsilon_{0}}, as free space meant in air not in any sort of medium.

So, maybe term I should have used is "source-free".
 
\nabla\cdot\vec{B}=0 I verified that

\nabla\times\vec{E}=\left|\begin{array}{ccc}\vec{i }& \vec{j} &\vec{k}\\\frac{\partial}{\partial x}& \frac{\partial}{\partial y}& \frac{\partial}{\partial z}\\ 0 & 0 & 3\sin (3z-6t) \end{array} \right|


\triangledown \times E gave me 0 and -\frac{\partial \vec{B}}{\partial t} =- \frac{2}{5} \cos(3z-6t) \vec{j}<br />

I think this wrong?
 
Last edited:
  • #10
robert,

You say:

divB = 0, I agree

curlE = 0, I agree

-dB/dt = (-2/5)sin(3z - 6t)j, I think you've got a mistake here
 
  • #12
\frac{\partial \vec{B}}{\partial t} =-\frac{2}{5} \cos(3z-6t) \vec{j}
So \nabla \times \vec E= -\frac{\partial \vec B}{\partial t}
are nor equal and they are not possible in region of space?
 
  • #13
That's that.It is not possible.They should identically solve every equation from Maxwell's system...

Daniel.
 
Back
Top