Understanding Mechanical Work: Ideal Gas and Fixed Pressure

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of mechanical work in the context of ideal gases and fixed pressure. Participants explore the definitions and mathematical formulations related to work, particularly the relationship between pressure, volume, and work done by a gas.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that since dW = -PdV, it implies that pressure must be fixed for W = -PV, leading to the conclusion that dP = 0.
  • Another participant counters that dW is misleading as it suggests a function of state, arguing that work and heat are energy in transit rather than quantities possessed by the system.
  • A participant argues that pressure can be considered fixed in general, leading to W = PV, and references the integral form of the ideal gas law to support this view.
  • Another participant clarifies that the differential work done by gas is dW = PdV, asserting that this holds even if pressure is not constant.
  • One participant elaborates on the integral of the ideal gas law, stating that either dV or dP must be zero for the integrated solution PV = nRT to hold true.
  • Another participant emphasizes that when pressure is constant, work is given by W = P ΔV, not simply PV, and notes that pressure varies in isothermal and adiabatic expansions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between pressure and work, with no consensus reached. Some maintain that pressure can be treated as fixed, while others argue against this notion, emphasizing the variable nature of pressure in different processes.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of determining the relationship between pressure and volume changes during processes, indicating that assumptions about constancy must be clearly defined. The discussion reflects varying interpretations of the mathematical relationships involved in mechanical work.

theory.beta
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I was wondering if I am having a definition problem on mechanical work.
Since dW = -PdV (as I was told in class), is it correct to say the pressure is fixed with W = -PV, since dW = d(PV) = -VdP - PdV = -PdV suggests dP = 0?

Thanks

S.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, it is not correct. dW is misleading notation. It suggests that dW is an infinitesimal change in some quantity, W, which the system possesses (a so-called 'function of state'). This is not the case. [For the same reason, dQ is also misleading notation, suggesting, wrongly, that some quantity, Q, is possessed by the system.] Work and heat are both energy IN TRANSIT, rather than residing in the system.

PV is a function of state (because P and V are both functions of state), but it is a mistake to regard dW as a differential of pV (or -PV).
 
Hi Philip,

Thank you for the reply. However, I still think P is fixed in general, leading W = PV. Let's look at an integral form of ideal gas law. In essence, we have dT = (PdV+VdP)/R; integrating this would give the ideal gas law. But the actual integrated solution as PV = nRT implies either dV or dP to be zero.
Another example would be the heat function in a system of fixed volume, where Q = W = E +PV (Landau textbook chapter 2, the W is a little confusing). He took the derivative of W into dP and dV separately.
Any thoughts? Thanks again.

S.
 
The differential work done by the gas on the surroundings is dW=PdV, not dW=-PdV. Even if the pressure isn't constant, the differential work is still PdV. This comes from dW=Fdl, where F is the force and dl is the differential displacement. Since F = PA, dW = PAdl. But Adl = dV. So dW = PdV. See my Blog on my PF personal page.

Chet
 
theory.beta said:
Hi Philip,

Thank you for the reply. However, I still think P is fixed in general, leading W = PV. Let's look at an integral form of ideal gas law. In essence, we have dT = (PdV+VdP)/R; integrating this would give the ideal gas law. But the actual integrated solution as PV = nRT implies either dV or dP to be zero.
The integral of dT is not PV unless you start from absolute 0.

[tex]nRΔT = nR\int_A^B dT = \int_A^B (Pdv + VdP) = \int_A^B d(PV) = P(B)V(B)-P(A)V(A) = ΔPV[/tex]

P could be constant in which case nRΔT = PΔV (i.e. ∫VdP = 0). Or V could be constant, in which case nRΔT = VΔP. Or P and V could both change. One cannot determine [itex]\int Pdv[/itex] or [itex]\int VdP[/itex] separately for a given process without knowing how P or V varies during the process. But from the ideal gas law, PV = nRT, we know that d(PV) = nRdT

AM
 
theory.beta said:
I still think P is fixed in general, leading W = PV.

Two of the best known ideal cases (but good approximations to real changes) are isothermal and adiabatic expansions. P varies in both of these.

When P is constant, then W = P ΔV, not PV.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
9K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K