Understanding Mercury's Precession

  • Thread starter OnceKnown
  • Start date
  • #1
20
0

Main Question or Discussion Point

I was recently given a lab to work at home but I am having trouble understanding the formulas that they have used.

The link to this lab Assignment:
http://classroom.sdmesa.edu/ssiegel/Physics%20197/labs/Mercury%20Precession.pdf

My problem relies to Query #1 of the lab assignment, with the equation
[itex]\frac{V(r)}{m}[/itex] = - [itex]\frac{M}{r}[/itex] + [itex]\frac{(\frac{L}{m})^{2}}{r^{2}}[/itex]

I derived it to be equal to:
[itex]\frac{d}{dr}[/itex] [itex]\frac{V(r)}{m}[/itex] = [itex]\frac{M}{r^{2}}[/itex] - [itex]\frac{2(\frac{L}{m})^{2}}{r^{3}}[/itex]

So I was told that M = mass of the Sun = 1.99 x 10[itex]^{30}[/itex] kg
m = mass of Mercury = 3.28 x 10[itex]^{23}[/itex] kg
L = angular momentum of Mercury = 9.11 x 10 [itex]^{38}[/itex] [itex]\frac{kg m^{2}}{s^{2}}[/itex]

I equated the derived equation to 0 and solved for " r " to get:
r[itex]_{o}[/itex] = [itex]\frac{2(\frac{L}{m})^{2}}{M}[/itex]

which r[itex]_{o}[/itex] = 7.729, which should be the radius at the effective potential minimum

But that doesn't make sense at all since the number is so low and the units doesn't seem right.
Can someone help with this?
 
Last edited:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
34,382
10,471
M/r should be GM/r with the gravitational constant G.
 
  • #3
20
0
Hi Mfb,

The equations were based off Newton's attempt to study Mercury's precession. And the point of the lab is to see why he was off in his calculations.

I'm wondering if the GM/r with with the gravitational constant G was used for the first attempt to calculate Mercury's precession by Newtonian methods?

Thank you for your help!
 
  • #4
34,382
10,471
Of course. You need the gravitational constant both in Newtonian gravity and General Relativity, otherwise the equations do not make sense (and the units to not match either).
 
  • #5
20
0
I have one last question on the lab assignment regarding to Query #5.

I'm getting an incorrect expression when working with Einstein's equation to determine the perihelion of Mercury. At the end of the equation I'm getting a negative number within the radical of my 2nd pic near the end.

I don't know if I did a calculation incorrectly or the formula was given to me incorrectly. I also added in the gravitational constant G to the formula.


1st Page:
38d9454e-7706-4f90-b903-0246a5047d03_zpsdf163876.jpg


2nd Page:
image-1_zps5276ba49.jpe


Let me know if you can read the images, sorry for the small writing.
 
  • #6
34,382
10,471
The units in the last equation do not match. Just check them in your formulas, and you will find the error.
 

Related Threads on Understanding Mercury's Precession

  • Last Post
Replies
24
Views
11K
Replies
1
Views
904
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
674
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Last Post
2
Replies
37
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
0
Views
2K
Top