Understanding Mercury's Precession

  • Thread starter Thread starter OnceKnown
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Precession
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a lab assignment focused on understanding Mercury's precession, where the user is struggling with the equations provided. They derived an equation related to the effective potential but found the resulting radius to be unexpectedly low and with incorrect units. Clarification was sought regarding the necessity of including the gravitational constant (G) in the calculations, which is essential for both Newtonian gravity and General Relativity. Additionally, the user encountered issues with a negative value in a radical while working through Einstein's equation for Mercury's perihelion, indicating potential calculation errors or formula inaccuracies. Accurate unit matching and the inclusion of G are crucial for resolving these issues.
OnceKnown
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
I was recently given a lab to work at home but I am having trouble understanding the formulas that they have used.

The link to this lab Assignment:
http://classroom.sdmesa.edu/ssiegel/Physics%20197/labs/Mercury%20Precession.pdf

My problem relies to Query #1 of the lab assignment, with the equation
\frac{V(r)}{m} = - \frac{M}{r} + \frac{(\frac{L}{m})^{2}}{r^{2}}

I derived it to be equal to:
\frac{d}{dr} \frac{V(r)}{m} = \frac{M}{r^{2}} - \frac{2(\frac{L}{m})^{2}}{r^{3}}

So I was told that M = mass of the Sun = 1.99 x 10^{30} kg
m = mass of Mercury = 3.28 x 10^{23} kg
L = angular momentum of Mercury = 9.11 x 10 ^{38} \frac{kg m^{2}}{s^{2}}

I equated the derived equation to 0 and solved for " r " to get:
r_{o} = \frac{2(\frac{L}{m})^{2}}{M}

which r_{o} = 7.729, which should be the radius at the effective potential minimum

But that doesn't make sense at all since the number is so low and the units doesn't seem right.
Can someone help with this?
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
M/r should be GM/r with the gravitational constant G.
 
Hi Mfb,

The equations were based off Newton's attempt to study Mercury's precession. And the point of the lab is to see why he was off in his calculations.

I'm wondering if the GM/r with with the gravitational constant G was used for the first attempt to calculate Mercury's precession by Newtonian methods?

Thank you for your help!
 
Of course. You need the gravitational constant both in Newtonian gravity and General Relativity, otherwise the equations do not make sense (and the units to not match either).
 
I have one last question on the lab assignment regarding to Query #5.

I'm getting an incorrect expression when working with Einstein's equation to determine the perihelion of Mercury. At the end of the equation I'm getting a negative number within the radical of my 2nd pic near the end.

I don't know if I did a calculation incorrectly or the formula was given to me incorrectly. I also added in the gravitational constant G to the formula.


1st Page:
38d9454e-7706-4f90-b903-0246a5047d03_zpsdf163876.jpg


2nd Page:
image-1_zps5276ba49.jpe


Let me know if you can read the images, sorry for the small writing.
 
The units in the last equation do not match. Just check them in your formulas, and you will find the error.
 
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Asteroid, Data - 1.2% risk of an impact on December 22, 2032. The estimated diameter is 55 m and an impact would likely release an energy of 8 megatons of TNT equivalent, although these numbers have a large uncertainty - it could also be 1 or 100 megatons. Currently the object has level 3 on the Torino scale, the second-highest ever (after Apophis) and only the third object to exceed level 1. Most likely it will miss, and if it hits then most likely it'll hit an ocean and be harmless, but...
Back
Top