Understanding Metric Connection and Geodesic Equations in General Relativity"

Mr-R
Messages
123
Reaction score
23
Dear all,

In my journey through learning General relativity. I have stumbled upon this problem. I have to calculate the geodesic equation for R^{3} in cylindrical polars. I am not sure how to use the metric connection. The indices confuse me. I would appreciate it if someone could shade some light on it. Every time I try to calculate it I get zero, sometimes due to the first metric tensor and sometime the terms in the parentheses are zeros.

\Gamma_{bc}^{a}=\frac{1}{2}g^{ad}(\partial_{b}g_{dc}+\partial_{c}g_{db}-\partial_{d}g_{bc})

As I understand it, the index d is the dummy index and runs from 1 to 3 in this case, right? What about b and c? how do I use them?

Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mr-R said:
As I understand it, the index d is the dummy index and runs from 1 to 3 in this case, right? What about b and c?

Yes and a, b and c can be 1, 2 or 3 giving 27 gamma's.

Mr-R said:
I am not sure how to use the metric connection. The indices confuse me.

You have to calculate all the gamma's, but a lot of them are equals or vanish.

Mr-R said:
Every time I try to calculate it I get zero, sometimes due to the first metric tensor and sometime the terms in the parentheses are zeros.

\Gamma_{bc}^{a}=\frac{1}{2}g^{ad}(\partial_{b}g_{dc}+\partial_{c}g_{db}-\partial_{d}g_{bc})

What did you find for the metric in these coordinates?
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
I actually got it now :smile:

Thanks bloby
 
Ok, you're welcome.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top